Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:retroactive? (Score 5, Informative) 30

This does not count as ex post facto. They would not be punished for their actions prior to this law, but would be for not complying with it going forward.

To go off the license example. You would be fine if you drove without a license prior to them being required. But if you continued to drive without one after they became required, then you would get in trouble.

Cloud

Video Don't Be a Server Hugger! (Video) 409

Curtis Peterson says admins who hang onto their servers instead of moving into the cloud are 'Server Huggers,' a term he makes sound like 'Horse Huggers,' a phrase that once might have been used to describe hackney drivers who didn't want to give up their horse-pulled carriages in favor of gasoline-powered automobiles. Curtis is VP of Operations for RingCentral, a cloud-based VOIP company, so he's obviously made the jump to the cloud himself. And he has reassuring words for sysadmins who are afraid the move to cloud-based computing is going to throw them out of work. He says there are plenty of new cloud computing opportunities springing up for those who have enough initiative and savvy to grab onto them, by which he obviously means you, right?
The Internet

FCC Votes To Consider Next Round of 'Net Neutrality' Rules 182

As you may have watched live earlier today, the FCC in a protester-heavy hearing has voted to formally consider a net neutrality proposal. The linked L.A. Times story says the 3-2 vote of the commissioners represents a victory for FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler: 'A Democrat who took over in November, Wheeler triggered outrage among public interest groups, online activists and many liberals with a plan that would for the first time allow the possibility of so-called pay-for-priority deals. Wheeler said his plan has been misconstrued and that it would not allow broadband providers to block any legal content or slow down connections in a way that is commercially unreasonable.' As the Washington Post points out, the phrase "commercially unreasonable" is a loaded one. More good coverage at Ars Technica, too.

Comment We're still doing this? (Score 1) 401

It pisses me off that we are still burning money over this jet. It's a really cool design, but is way too complicated and cost ineffective for any kind of real use. We already have jets that work and have worked great for a long time, and using these would gain us nothing on the battlefield. The only reason the damn thing is still being researched is because someone (or many ones) are greedy and not thinking about the interests of others or the greater good. I'll have a smile on my face the day this waste of a program gets shut down.

Comment Re:Ah, it's a hydrogen car! (Score 1) 115

To me, why not just use a natural gas or propane fuel cell?

I know nothing of propane fuel cells, but I do know that the method which is used to extract natural gas is absolutely horrendous for the environment; it destroys huge swaths of land and makes taking drinking water from anywhere around it completely unusable.

http://www.nrdc.org/energy/gasdrilling/
freaking fracking

Comment "Would have walked away" (Score 1) 73

"the pilot would have walked away" is worded terribly and unnervingly the actual article states "a 'pilot would have walked away'" which is written better, but still in an extremely confusing manner What they meant to say is that there was no pilot on the flight (as it was unmanned), but had there been, he or she would have walked away from the crash-landing.

Slashdot Top Deals

Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way.

Working...