Re:Some background information (Score 1)

It's a Wiki standard that articles shouldn't get much bigger than 50kb. Remember, these are suppposed to be encyclopedia articles, not rambling essays. At the time the article was split, it was much larger than that, with the bulk of it the criticism section. If you think you can put the criticism back in, keep the article under 50kb, and make everything concise and NPOV you're welcome to do so. Right now several editors are working together towards that goal. I hope we can do it, because I agree with you: the criticism should be part of the article.

I just don't understand why when people see something wrong with Wikipedia they don't just fix it instead of posting smugly to their blog and accusing other's of being "Wal-Mart lobbyists" without a lick of proof.