Comment Re:Capt. Obivous finds another explanation! (Score 1) 52
This at home vs. at school variant appeared elsewhere with similar results.
And this remains the question. I sincerely doubt 58,000 people committed AI test taking fraud. Furthermore, time of day matters a lot for test taking and learning. Many studies have shown that humans in general fare less well on cognitive tasks early in the day vs. later in the day. The location as burni2 indicated also matters. Home relaxes the body and mind. Being in a room with 50 other test takers, less so.
It is my opinion that we do not need to train humans to be information storage and retrieval devices. Often times, this results in the garbage in, garbage out problem. Information becomes dated or is invalidated by newer data and the human still retains the older data. Overwriting such data is frequently challenged by the now challenged human. In many cases, the degree that is being sought - such as the MBA - is a less valuable degree and results in a jobless human now dependent on a society/system that typically disposes of an inferior product. Remanufacturing such a human is costly as well and is frequently met with the overwriting problem stated earlier.
All this is to say that the NEET exam and UNAM exam are symptoms of a problem. I find it odd that the very institutions that claim to be top tier researchers in education, socioeconomic development and more, are the ones that purposely disregard factual evidence indicating that the mechanics of education is presently flawed.