THE fact??? another fact you have seemingly overlooked is a paper vote is only as reliable as the sum of all of the individuals who have had physical access to it.

and to guide your realization further, just because someone isn't physically with a voter in the booth doesn't mean a video transmission device couldn't be used to prove a vote was made to deter some hostile act from happening to the voter.

if we can't make online voting work, we can't function at all in the digital age.

claiming that he wouldn't have gone public if there WERE "human-written" messages is an admission of guilt... the crime isn't in the existence of messages, but the potential for such messages to exist. that potential did exist, and "Random Digilante" has conceded as such.

has there been robust testing yet or not?

it is what schizophrenia can be... the anonymous coward did not provide all the symptoms seen for the diagnosis of a disease WHERE NO TEST EXISTS.

talk about wasting time. how about this, i diagnose you as an idiotic asshole. symptoms include being an idiotic asshole or having an idiotic asshole mother.

he didn't suggest anything... because HE doesn't exist. a COWARD made the claims against me THAT CAN NOT BE PROVEN TRUE. A PERSON has rejected those claims WITH PROVABLE FACTS.

i DO exist. i am michael david kristopeit.

you are NOTHING