Comment Re:difficulties? (Score -1) 102
someone beats you, moron.
you're an idiot.
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
someone beats you, moron.
you're an idiot.
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
you said you had sex that you didn't want to have. either you were lying or you were raped. are you a liar?
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
time for you to cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
in every way how, you're an idiot.
cower in my shadow in your paid in full shanty some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
i am michael kristopeit.
cower in my shadow some more behind your chosen manager of arbitrary textual file markup protocol based pseudonym, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
cower in my shadow some more behind your chosen impudence based pseudonym, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
why do you cower in my shadow? what are you afraid of?
you're completely pathetic.
10,000/400 boxes vs 1... or 2 with a failover switch is not simply a matter of cheapness relative to dollars... you're an idiot.
cower in my shadow some more behind your chosen masculinity based pseudonym, lady feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
Your creating what-if scenarios that have no basis in TFA was just as lame as your attempt to say it wasn't practical because of the higher cost of electrical consumption, when TFA made it clear that electricity use wasn't a consideration.
... and "Your" proving you don't know the difference between "You're" and "Your"... you're an idiot.
nice attempt at a sentence, tom... you almost made one, moron. TFA was just... because cost, that when electricity. did you have a stroke, tom?
cower in my shadow some more behind your chosen masculinity based pseudonym, lady feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
cower in my shadow some more behind your chosen pseudonym, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
"Assume that an attacker provides you with a file containing his contact information and that a vulnerability in the address book allows the malicious user to take control of the application."
it isn't that it's not a vulnerability... it's that it's based on an assumption of vulnerability.
you're an idiot.
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
cower in my shadow some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXV-yaFmQNk
Do you laugh or do you weep for the future.
do you not understand how statements work or are you and idiot or both.
i have 2 children. babies like to crinkle paper. maybe if you weren't busy cowering behind your chosen wielded blade based pseudonym you'd realize the rest of the world is much more interesting than a 2 dimensional image, interactive or not... especially to someone who has experienced very little of it.
you're an idiot.
Beware the new TTY code!