so it's still shitware, you were still in an abusive relationship, and it still consisted of unwanted sex that was deemed part of a "job".

you make me sick.

you are completely pathetic.

why does jay little say that Alexander Peter Kowalski is a purporter of "shitware"?

what caused the claimed abuse from APK's claimed failed relationship?

why was unwanted sexual contact justified as part of a "job"?

you're an idiot.

saying you were raped = true... it happened. i said it, because you said you had unwanted sex. if you are this careless with boolean assignment, i can only imagine how poorly the software you've claimed to have made functions.

you said you had sex that you didn't want to have. either you were lying or you were raped. are you a liar?

cower in my shadow some more, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

in every way how, you're an idiot. cower in my shadow in your paid in full shanty some more, feeb. you're completely pathetic.

when was the election to appoint inviolet (#797804) a speaker of any society that includes me?

you're an idiot.

cower in my shadow some more, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

when injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty

your definition of identical is identical to ignorant hypocrisy.

you're an idiot.

if others call my claim of your idiocy into question, do i not have the choice to ignore them, while i remain correct and you remain an idiot?

demanding anything of me is a fool's task.

cower in my shadow some more, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

anyone looking at your posts will see that you call yourself tom, tom.

cower in my shadow some more behind your chosen masculinity based pseudonym, lady feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

i am a frequent target of such organized down-mod attacks... i know from experience that you can also be hit with a permanent ban on your IP address, and permanent ban on your user account... you log in and slashdot returns a pink screen saying "BANNED". your account will never work again. you have to clear cookies before logging in again. for IP address bans, i just restart my cable modem... new IP address = no more ban + the next person that gets that IP address will be banned. this has happened dozens of times. after enough time, every IP address will be banned.

i have an email thread with rob malda containing 100s of messages of him claiming no idea of why or how i was banned, yet being completely unwilling of removing the ban, and not caring at all about the innocent people who receive the banned IP address next and find themselves unable to use the slashdot service.

slashdot = stagnated.

score:-1, insightful.

slashdot = stagnated

they didn't lose anything... they simply didn't gain the $4,000,000,000 that they claimed was owed them, but courts determined wasn't.

the editors of this internet web site chat room message board are very irresponsible.

slashdot = stagnated.

"proper" is relative to intention... if one application is trusted to engage in network activity, and another application that isn't trusted to engage in network activity, but is trusted to communicate with the other application and proxy network requests through it, that isn't a breakdown in security... it's completely proper, as the intention was for ease of security policy administration.

ur mum's face're a schmuck.

a firewall is a limited privilege execution environment... the execution of delivery of bits from a source to a target... exactly the same as the sandbox controls used to keep bits out of the execution stack. you're an ignorant hypocrite.

cower in my shadow some more behind your chosen fecal consumption based pseudonym, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

ur mum's face's the trollbot.

cower in my shadow some more, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

different =/= much of a stretch.

government access =/= consumer access.

what about the chain of custody requirements or ownership of liability?

you're an idiot.