ur mum's face is waldo.

who is "us"?

you arre exactly what you've claimed to be: NOTHING.

cower in my shadow some more, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

ur mum's face is wally.

cower in my shadow some more, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

that wasn't me... why are you responded to someone asking me questions anonymous coward?

if you want to find out what i'll do if you attempt to violate my rights, there is only one way to find out.

ur mum's face know, you're an idiot.

slashdot IS stagnated. you ARE an idiot cowering in my shadow.

you're also an ignorant hypocrite, but you probably think tom would be proud of you...

if you "truely" believed that, then you could just as well argue that a facebook account couldn't "truely" be linked to you.

you're an ignorant hypocrite.

always roll your own.

facebook's implementation is trivial to build on a scale relative to a single network of users.

ur mum's face = boring troll

you're an ignorant hypocrite.

cower in my shadow some more, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

the truth = troll

slashdot = stagnated

you're. an. ignorant. hypocrite.

so every firewall application or appliance is completely useless? maybe SELinux should change it's name to CULinux.

you're an idiot.

i know why you're "bother"... it's the same reason that you don't really know why... you're an ignorant hypocrite.

if there are new service requirements, and consumers of those services will soon be sending requests for those, then PREP work must be done to GET READY for the impending requests.

maintenance is done after the fact. you're a moron.

you're less than an idiot... you're exactly what you've claimed to be: NOTHING.

cower in my shadow some more, feeb.

yeah, the equipment should just update itself and anticipate which signals should trigger an alert, and what the format of that alert should be.

you're an idiot.

i was hoping you wouldn't post actions you would take if prerequisites that were not fulfilled actually were fulfilled.

if you hadn't posted such ignorance, i wouldn't have to call you an idiot.

you're an idiot.

considering that picture does not include the flower garden around the mailbox, the blooming bushes around the walkway, or the hanging plants that my wife installed around the porch when we moved in 2 years ago, i'd have to suggest that you, dude, consider using a more reliably updated source for your criticisms.

you're an idiot.

you create a service that does the exact same thing to facebook that they are doing to you.

imagine a network service where any of your friends can choose to re-share everything you post on facebook, and every member of that network service could view everything from everyone. only a very small portion of facebook users would need to use the service to cover the majority of facebook users, and no one could be completely sure which of their "friends" was doing the re-share, unless they only shared it with one person... and in order to confirm the data was on the re-share service, they would have to admit to using it themselves.