you can help people that you aren't turned on by. there isn't a rule against that. you're an ignorant hypocrite

chase down my responses some more monkey. whine about claims of others stalking you while you incessantly search for another reply to respond to. read the information, then deny it... just like a paranoid, delusional recluse would.

admit to more abuse.

whine more about being raped... then claim it wasn't rape... then claim that i, or others, would put themselves in the same position... when i deny it, claim i would anyways. just lie.

back to your bush shanty lower level apartment with your 65+ year old roommate named jan, feeb.

Alexander Peter Kowalski has admitted to abusing a former (only?) girlfriend... claiming it just "happens"... then claims that it's funny, and he's laughing about it.

Alexander Peter Kowalski seems to have many unsatisfied customers

i suppose your listed address includes "Apartment #1, Lower Level", because you rent out the "Higher Levels" of your home to people who can afford to not live with people above them... or maybe they just couldn’t keep their taxes up to date. somehow, i suppose...

i suppose the 65+ year old named jan that is listed as living with you is your hot cougar wife... not your mother...... you couldn't possibly be so cliché as to be a 45 year old living in your mom's basement............. could you??????? if you'd rather i call and ask her, that's ok.... just don't respond here...

cower in my shadow some more, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

you're an ignorant hypocrite.

cower in my shadow some more, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

cower in my shadow some more, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

that the properly motivated people of california would have no say about CONTROLLING the profitability of such a venture.

you're an idiot.

in general, as long as your argument is based on an assumption of profitability, you're an idiot.

who is "we"?

doesn't the air force have a marketeering department? doesn't rob malda have a bank account?

slashdot = stagnated

how does an omission of obviousness in any way change the statement's truthfulness?

do you want a pipeline stage dedicated to determining if an emulation layer should be implemented, or would you rather scrap the stage and gain lower latency AND higher throughput?

you expect a processor not natively built to run arbitrary code to perform similarly to a processor that was built to run the code natively?

you're an idiot. is that why you are mad?

an ignorant hypocrite would be proud of simply not being ""nothing" nor "pathetic"".

cower in my shadow some more, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

there is a reason you are Low Ranked...and it has nothing to do with me or my breakfast.

you're a presumptuous moron.

ur mum's face have the social graces and sense of humor of a striped, horse like animal with a lisp.

cower in my shadow some more, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

you certainly cowered as commanded.

the causality is you're completely pathetic.

slashdot = stagnated.

cower behind your chosen pseudonym some more, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

how you could possibly not understand the necessity of trust within a force empowered with weapons befuddles and confounds me.

access need not be given to be obtained... you're an ignorant hypocrite.

cower behind your chosen pseudonym some more, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

you're a liar.

i live in wisconsin which allows me to record all calls to my home, do you consent to me releasing an audio recording publicly?

cower some more, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

you claim to me that you're not stephen alongi after never being accused of such? that is very telling.

you're an idiot.