is this what you do for your pathetic kicks?

you're an idiot.

if you'd like a firearms demonstration, come to my home. you have cowered in my shadow and refused to provide yours.

you are completely pathetic.

cower some more, feeb.

how soon before someone on a shared hosting server installs the mirror code, and the FBI sweeps in and takes the whole server down?

ur mum's face = redundant.

cower some more, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

you're a presumptuously ignorant hypocrite.

did your mother name you "durrr"?

why do you cower in the shadows of an assumed pseudonym? what are you afraid of?

you're completely pathetic

why would the signal need to be routed through the CPU? there are already cheap ASICs that do resizing/deinterlacing... but even without using one of those... the FPGA could handle the task on it's own and output directly to video memory.

might have spoke too soon.... this looks promising

i'm sold on HDMI as well... i want a 5.1 surround system with 3-5 HDMI inputs and speaker wire outputs with a single HDMI audio/video out. i haven't been able to find something like this... i'm looking in the $300 and below range. it seems like such a device would be cheap due to it's simplicity.

those markets are building products that are extremely cheap and yet functional for 95%+ of most users' task demands... if intel doesn't compete in those markets, eventually the markets they do compete in won't be required. a 2010 "netbook" blows away an average 1997 desktop. what am i doing on my 2015 desktop that requires so much more computational power or specialization than before?

sufficiency is cancer to intel's unchanged business model.

exactly what i was thinking... either the cpu would be utilized in post processing, or almost not at all writing the ram buffer to disk.

what about low-volume products? what about low-performance products? why not discuss them?

mask fees alone for ASICs are going to run 6 figures real quick.

granted, i don't see a use for CPU+FPGA in 1 package... but i also don't see a use for telling only half the story.

really? what sort of application are you thinking could benefit from a FPGA but also simultaneously saturate a PCI-E lane?

i am a human measured in _micro_grams... 99,790,321,400 micrograms.

you're an idiot.

the most valid question to be asked of a claimed product breakthrough = troll.

slashdot = stagnated

considering we're talking about an audio card intended for digital to analog and analog to digital conversion, WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT ANALOG CIRCUITRY. you're an idiot.

now tell me the latency values i've requested, or continue your attempt to confuse the issue... you're completely pathetic.

do you refuse to provide the numbers because they are laughably unusable for any real world application?

i want to listen to one track while recording another... what is the latency between when the signal is sent by the operating system of the host controller and when the sound is heard through the headphones? what is the latency between when sound is picked up by the microphone and when it is available to the operating system of the host controller?

quoting analog signal physics while discussion digital devices = +3 informative.

slashdot = stagnated

listen to what i'm telling you. YOU'RE AN IDIOT.

ur mum's face is being a total dick in the process.

i respect the existence of the dead. you only wait to die.

you're completely pathetic.