so because you read an article about people taking 2 and 3 days off, you don't believe someone stating the same article you read isn't talking about people taking 1 day off..........

you're an idiot.

you feel upset?

are you attempting to contradict the facts i've given?

why do you cower? what are you afraid of?

you're completely pathetic.

how about you don't respond with hypocritical ignorance?

you're an idiot.

and yet you respond to me, while hypocritically confirming my claims.

did your mother name you "TheRaven64"?

you beg for the praise of those entrusted with the responsibility of moderating this website internet chat room messageboard. you're completely pathetic.

if i, and those like me who remember what this site used to be, continue to do nothing, then nothing will change. that is the implication of stagnation, moron.

you're an idiot.

i'm 6'4", 220lbs... i have justifiably maimed before.

why do you cower? what are you afraid of?

ur mum's face is faggot.

you're completely pathetic.

TAKING THE RESPONSIBILITY IS PART OF THE CONTRACT.

you instead place the responsibility for your lies IN MY NAME.

ur mum's face is an idiot.

you spend your days in a fantasy land addressing yourself relative TO ME. PRETENDING TO BE ME. i spend my days actually BEING me. do you NEED to be me? OR, do you simply NEED to NOT BE YOURSELF?

you're a TOTAL DISGRACE.

still not willing to take responsibility for your lies? only able to feebly welcome me to present myself to you, but not provide an address for me to do so? you're an ignorant hypocrite.

you're completely worthless. YOU make everything about me BY DENYING THE EXISTENCE OF YOURSELF.

you're completely pathetic.

you spend your days in a fantasy land addressing yourself relative TO ME. i spend my days actually BEING me. do you NEED to be me? OR, do you simply NEED to NOT BE YOURSELF?

you're a TOTAL DISGRACE.

still not willing to take responsibility for your lies? only able to feebly welcome me to present myself to you, but not provide an address for me to do so? you're an ignorant hypocrite.

you're completely worthless. YOU make everything about me BY DENYING THE EXISTENCE OF YOURSELF.

you're completely pathetic.

you spend your days in a fantasy land addressing yourself relative TO ME. i spend my days actually BEING me. do you NEED to be me? OR, do you simply NEED to NOT BE YOURSELF?

you're a TOTAL DISGRACE.

still not willing to take responsibility for your lies? only able to feebly welcome me to present myself to you, but not provide an address for me to do so? you're an ignorant hypocrite.

you're completely worthless. YOU make everything about me BY DENYING THE EXISTENCE OF YOURSELF.

you're completely pathetic.

so if the log of a person serving legal notices says that they left the building to serve a document, that document has been served? you're an idiot. an editable text file on a computer that claims a message was SENT is quite obviously NOT proof that the message was RECEIVED.

the browser history is not open to inspection, and even if it was, that is still not proof of WHO loaded the page to receive the message.

i've stated many times that one time when i reset my modem and received a new IP address, slashdot reported my IP was banned... i contacted rob malda and he said the system is automated and there is no log or audit trail and the ban would not be removed. I SAW THE PAGE INTENDED FOR SOMEONE ELSE. the reason the system is broken is morons like you that don't understand system architecture.

you have absolutely no understanding of logic.

you're an idiot.

why do you cower? what are you afraid of?

you're completely pathetic.

tracking pixels are not unwanted behavior... they don't behave at all. you're an idiot.

tracking pixels are only as "unwanted" as cookies are unnecessary.

you have a severe logical disconnect between necessity and sufficiency, and the potential for opposing viewpoints. bugs are not unwanted behavior... they are only UNINTENDED behavior, perhaps adding wanted functionality by mistake.

why do you cower? what are you afraid of?

you're completely pathetic.

"misuse" is relative to wikipedia's definition... "use" is relative to the user of wikipedia.

it's not a contradiction... it's an out of context quote.

you're an idiot.

you said "the problem here is NOT the "one IP address = one person"" assumption, when it obviously is.

you're an idiot.