#1: in [the Electric Universe framework and approach], "theory" is indistinguishable from "speculation in prose".
Er, you're off to a terrible start if that is your premise. Birkeland experimented with real things in a real lab. That terella, his spheres, his electrical equipment was all significantly different from "prose", as were his list of "predictions".
#2: EU theories cannot be falsified, even in principle, by any experimental ("in the lab") or observational results.
What?!?!? You're the one peddling a Lambda-CDM theory cannot be falsified by anything! EU theories can be *verified* in a lab. Compare and contrast that with "inflation", or dark energy that it evidently shy around a lab. You're no 0 for 2, and you pegged the irony meter on that one.
#2a: Within the Electric Universe framework and approach, evidence presented does not need to accurately reflect its source, nor be fully attributed; copyrights need not be respected.
Boloney. You won't be bothered to read the sources I have suggested to you, and it's copyrighted. 0 for 2.5
#3: EU theories are internally inconsistent.
0 for 3. No, inflation is internally inconsistent with every other vector and scalar field in nature. EU theory is consistently about the flow of electrons through plasma. The mainstream is consistently trying to deny that the plasmas of space are influenced by the flow of electrons through plasma.
You have intentionally misrepresented EU theory for years Nereid, and you have intentionally failed to educated yourself on EU theory. Some scientist you are. Ever read Cosmic Plasma yet, or are you just too busy crusading from a place of pure ignorance still?