Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
News

VP.net Promises "Cryptographically Verifiable Privacy" (torrentfreak.com) 36

TorrentFreak spotlights VP.net, a brand-new service from Private Internet Access founder Andrew Lee (the guy who gifted Linux Journal to Slashdot) that eliminates the classic "just trust your VPN" problem by locking identity-mapping and traffic-handling inside Intel SGX enclaves. The company promises 'cryptographically verifiable privacy' by using special hardware 'safes' (Intel SGX), so even the provider can't track what its users are up to.

The design goal is that no one, not even the VPN company, can link "User X" to "Website Y."

Lee frames it as enabling agency over one's privacy:

"Our zero trust solution does not require you to trust us - and that's how it should be. Your privacy should be up to your choice - not up to some random VPN provider in some random foreign country."

The team behind VP.net includes CEO Matt Kim as well as arguably the first Bitcoin veterans Roger Ver and Mark Karpeles.

Ask Slashdot: Now that there's a VPN where you don't have to "just trust the provider" - arguably the first real zero-trust VPN - are trust based VPNs obsolete?

Comment Yes and Yes (Score 3, Interesting) 247

I use ChatGPT almost daily. I use it to write short scripts that have very well defined behaviours. Sure, it makes mistakes, and I have to check its code, but it saves me a heap of time looking up obscure functions. And it comments its code quite nicely. Sometimes, the comments are a bit inane, but I've seen so much uncommented code in my life, seeing any comments at all is a breath of fresh air.

I think that the mistake people make is that they assume that if ChatGPT can write a good 10 line function, then it can write a good 1000 line suite of functions. It cannot.

Its a tool, and it does very well when it is used in the context in which it performs. The wrong tool will do poorly at any task.

I would estimate that ChatGPT saves me about 5-6 hours a week. Time that I can spend on my higher skills rather than my grunt code-monkey skills.

Comment Re:LibreOffice improved (Score 1, Interesting) 221

We completely dumped M$ Office in favour of LibreOffice a couple of years ago. The transition was relatively painless... certainly easier than upgrading to the next iteration of Office.

As October approaches, I'm starting to feel that maybe this is the time to switch the bulk of our gear to Linux. In the past, the hesitancy to upgrade to the next M$OS was mostly about defects and transition costs, but this year, there is an insidious feeling of anxiety that to continue with Microsoft will be a mistake. We have a few skills with Linux, and are using it for some rudimentary systems (eg soft routers, phone systems, etc).

Perhaps the time has come to bite the bullet and put it on the desktop.

I'm too old for this sh!t.

Comment Bad business model (Score 1) 134

If your business model relies on traffic sent to you by an advertising company, your income stream is pretty fragile.

The bigger concern is the consolidation of human knowledge into a capitalist organisation (eg Alphabet).

When websites collapse due to loss of revenue from ad traffic, the training resources for AI will evaporate too.

The tension between the two is palpable. I expect that the balance point between the two will be completely unfit to service either.

Comment Re:Markdown (Score 1) 27

How about this, then: It fills a niche, but it is full of bad decisions (and fragmentation), and survives mainly by its existing momentum. It's crap in the same sense that Unix is crap: the founder effect has made its flaws impossible to dislodge or rethink.

A popular solution to a problem is not necessarily a good solution to that problem.

Comment Re:How do they know? (Score 1) 44

There's nothing much to doubt. The evidence is always the same: "our web server logs show scrapers originating from IP addresses owned by someone who didn't pay us."

The Verge article is a little clearer. 100,000 threads pilfered over the past year with scraping! Oh no!

(See also: the actual legal filing. I have to admit the headings sound a little unstable.)

Comment Re:Now for the trickle down... (Score 1) 117

I don't think that its won yet. The problem needs to become sufficiently serious/painful before society will get serious about a solution. This is why the world is so slow to tackle climate change.

UBIs are being tested in several of the more liberal democracies around the world, and some are showing some successes. Not the silver bullet to overthrow capitalism yet, but social revolution takes time.

I have three kids, all post grads in various technology fields. None of them have jobs in their field of qualification, but all three are excelling in their careers (though, for one of them, I'm not sure if crypto-trading can be called a career even if it is exceptionally lucrative).

There is still time, and positive outcomes are not out of reach yet. Have a little faith in the next generation.
Patents

Intel Wins Jury Trial Over Patent Licenses In $3 Billion VLSI Fight (reuters.com) 22

A Texas jury ruled that Intel may hold a license to patents owned by VLSI Technology through its agreement with Finjan Inc., both controlled by Fortress Investment Group -- potentially nullifying over $3 billion in previous patent infringement verdicts against Intel. Reuters reports: VLSI has sued Intel in multiple U.S. courts for allegedly infringing several patents covering semiconductor technology. A jury in Waco, Texas awarded VLSI $2.18 billion in their first trial in 2021, which a U.S. appeals court has since overturned and sent back for new proceedings.

An Austin, Texas jury determined that VLSI was entitled to nearly $949 million from Intel in a separate patent infringement trial in 2022. Intel has argued in that case that the verdicts should be thrown out based on a 2012 agreement that gave it a license to patents owned by Finjan and other companies "under common control" with it. U.S. District Judge Alan Albright held the latest jury trial in Austin to determine whether Finjan and VLSI were under the "common control" of Fortress. VLSI said it was not subject to the Finjan agreement, and that the company did not even exist until four years after it was signed.

Slashdot Top Deals

It's time to boot, do your boot ROMs know where your disk controllers are?

Working...