Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Edward Snowden as well (Score 1) 366

Perhaps a more interesting poll would have been about who President Obama should pardon. While I agree that the whistle-blowers should be pardoned, I think it would be much better to pardon all of the people who are in prison for marijuana-related crimes in jurisdictions where their crime is no longer illegal. Seems to me like a form of post facto punishment, and such a blanket pardon would REALLY piss off #PresidentTweety.

You do understand that there isn't a jurisdiction in the USA that Marijuana is legal?
There are a few places where state and local authorities have decided that they won't prosecute, but the federal law is still in place that makes manufacture, distribution, and sale illegal in the whole US territory?

Comment Re:charging available only at power stations? (Score 1) 198

Just plant it next to your brand spanking new Nuke reactor to power this. Looking on the web, the most powerful Nuclear site contains 3 reactors generating 3,937 MW of power... Quickly divide this by 328KW leaves us with abut 12K cars super charging at once.
If you have 3500 acres to spare you could go with Solar. The largest solar plant produces 400 MW, dividing by 328kW leaves us with a little over 1000 cars during a sunny day.

Comment Re:Obama.... (Score 5, Insightful) 296

The internet isn't being taken over. All ICANN controls is the DNS subsystem. If it becomes abused - the internet will treat it as a failure and route around the failure (ie. One of the alternate DNS systems will become popular instead). How simple is it to route around this failure... Run your DNS resolver and adjust the root hints file to point to somewhere other than the 13 DNS roots out there.

This is a non-event at worst

Comment Re:Culture (Score 1) 201

Lower the drinking age to 16 years, and raise the driving age to 18 years

Worst idea ever. Why do we need to raise the driving age to 18? If you have a teen age child - you know how hard it is to get them to all of their activities, school, friends, work... The easy solution is to have them get their drivers license and get them a car to use. If they want to do anything somewhere else all you need to provide is the gas money - not take time off of work, or make them stay at home and do nothing.

I do agree with lowering the drinking age to 16. Much better that kids learn to drink around their parents that can monitor and encourage good behavior. Nothing like getting your kid to appreciate a good 20 year old single malt - no way they can afford to binge drink that in college.

Comment Re:Does Zoning Abrogate First Amendment? (Score 1) 305

This is what I've never quite understood: why does it seem that zoning laws are allowed to ignore constitutional freedoms? Banning research and development, "including software coding" would seem to ignore the right to free speech, free assembly and the right to privacy (if it's my property and I'm not doing anything dangerous toward my neighbors, why does the city care what I'm doing inside?)

Look, I understand that we don't want coal factories building next to residences. That all makes sense to me, and I could see an argument that this doesn't restrict constitutional freedom. But where does a city get off telling a person they can't run a business (e.g. sole proprietorship) out of their home?

So while I'm afraid that Palo Alto could follow through on this threat, it boggles the mind how it could in the USA. I also think it would be royally dumb for them to kick out all of these businesses too, but that's a different discussion.

You missed the correct amendment. It is the 5th amendment... Very specifically the taking clause that would prevent Palo Alto from taking the use of my property without compensating me for it. I don't think Palo Alto could afford to pay companies for their now worthless buildings as what else could you use them for?

Comment Re:The cost of fiber optics is growing? (Score 2) 31

You are kidding right?

This isn't a telco play (2km doesn't get you anywhere... Plus who needs 100G to the home today - I would settle for 1G) - it is a data center play. 2km is a data center distance, large clusters are easily hosted in rooms of this size - and even inter rack distances can get into the 10's of meters. Frankly others have had 100G silicon photonics out for a while (read about a year).

Comment Re:$78,000,000,000 (Score 1, Interesting) 102

You don't plan on retiring?

A 5% return on 1,000,000 is 50K a year. That doesn't go very far when you have to cover your medical expenses, housing, food, and hopefully seeing your grandkids.

1,000,000 dollars isn't really all that much. Take an average 40 year working life, invest/save 25K a year - 40 years later... magic 1,000,000. Rather than complain about someone who provided value to millions of customers - why don't you go after the football/basketball/baseball players that get paid millions a year to play a game.

Comment Re:Retail investors (Score 1) 192

Retail investing should be banned. Unwashed masses should only be allowed to by index funds.

Wow - this has to be the stupidest thing I have ever seen.
Please lets start with a few problems:
1. Please define Unwashed Masses and give a definition that will show who is in/out of the group that isn't allowed to trade
2. Please define index fund - separate an index fund from something like Magellan which is one of the larges funds in the world, but is far from an index fun

Now that we have that out of the way, explain how making choices for myself should be made unlawful? Are you going to ban the lottery that has an even lower payout? What about my 401K plan, what choices am I allowed to have in my 401K... Is this different than "retail investing"?

Comment Re:Just ban them (Score 1) 1144

The sale of automatic weapons is highly regulated and almost impossible to purchase on the civilian market. To be fair, semi-automatic weapons are far more accurate causing a significantly higher fatality rate. If you want to lower the number of deaths in a mass shooting, allow shooters to purchase fully automatic weapons, after the 3rd round - the rest of the bullets go into the ceiling causing very few fatalities as they run out of ammo faster.

The problem with an unarmed populace is there is no way to revolt from an unjust government.

Slashdot Top Deals

The first sign of maturity is the discovery that the volume knob also turns to the left.