Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:depends (Score 1) 1137

IMO, the "last mile" problem is best addressed by innovation on the humble bicycle platform. Green Gear Cycling in Eugene OR (http://www.bikefriday.com/), maker of a fast-fold, public-transit friendly model called the Tikit, is on the right track (if it's fair to say about train-based intermodal transit). See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_bu4JCO2-I&feature=PlayList&p=7889C5D2E10D4424&index=0. Weather objections are met by products such as the bike "roof" system distributed by GoEco in Limerick Ireland, a place not known for dray weather. http://www.goeco.ie/retractable_bike_roof.html. Brompton (UK) http://www.brompton.co.uk/ and Dahon (California) also offer folders although they are not aimed as directly at the intermodal market as Bike Friday's answer.

Comment Re:Should have stop at, Aren't FAXes the weirdest (Score 1) 531

Opening Scene: Dusty banditos are trying to jump Bogie's claim in "Treasure of the Sierra Madre." But in this sequence they're sombreros keep the desert sun off their Brooks Bros. suits and expensive Hartman briefcases. Dialogue: After confused discussion between the banditos about the strange word "Faxes" the rough-voiced leader shouts back to Bogie: "Faxes. . . We don' need no steenkin' Faxes!"

By law, all pleadings and motions filed in a United States District Court must be signed by an attorney of record or by the litigant appearing pro per. Fed Rul. Civ. Proc. 11(a); http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule11.htm. United States District Courts in all states now require counsel to e-file substantially everything, effectively requiring e-signatures on every court document that is filed.

In the Eastern District of California, attorneys' e-signatures under Rule 11(a) and mis-use of e-signature privileges are specifically covered by Local Rules 7-131(c) and (d), insuring the integrity of the process. http://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caed/staticOther/page_459.htm And after at two years of experience with the system, our Judges, US Magistrates, court staff, attorneys, and paralegals would NEVER willingly go back to the old ways (which included fax-filing options).

In complex cases, California State Courts can order the parties to use Case Home Page, a well-run private, user-supported e-case management service that also requires e-signatures. (http://www.casehomepage.com). I am litigating a class action lawsuit and at least 12 related individual cases in San Diego County that would be logistically and economically impossible without the help of Case Home Page.

By taking advantage of off-the-shelf IT products (including video-conference capability), the Bench and Bar have cut our previously HUGE environmental footprint while providing user-friendly, fast, accessible, and substantially more economical service to our clients.

I'm prejudiced, of course: I helped beta the Eastern District Court's e-filing and case retrieval systems and take proud ownership of what my colleagues, our Judges, and the Court's consulting and resident geek staff members accomplished at extremely low cost to the Taxpayer. I beta tested a number of browsers running Linux (I think I used Yellow Dog and Red Hat for the tests), Windoze XP (both native and using a PowerPC compatible emulator), and MacOS 9 and X in a number of configurations using dial-ups, DSL, T-1 and T-3 access points. The Court's IT staff was a joy to work with and, as a Federal Bar Assn. Member, I'm really stoked to have been a part of the process.

So faxes? " . . we don' need no steenkin' Faxes!"

Security

Submission + - Prof. Johan Pouwelse to Take on RIAA Expert

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes: "Marie Lindor has retained an expert witness of her own to fight the RIAA, and to debunk the testimony and reports of the RIAA's expert" Dr. Doug Jacobson, the "reliability" of which has been challenged by Ms. Lindor in her Brooklyn federal court case, UMG v. Lindor. Ms. Lindor's expert is none other than Prof. Johan Pouwelse, Chairman of the Parallel and Distributed Systems Group of Delft University of Technology. It was Prof. Pouwelse's scathing analysis of the RIAA's MediaSentry "investigations" (pdf) in Foundation v. UPC Nederland in the Netherlands which caused the (pdf) courts (pdf) in that country to direct the ISP's there not to turn over the names and addresses of their subscribers, thus nipping in the bud the RIAA's intended litigation juggernaut in that country. Prof. Pouwelse testified in the Netherlands that the RIAA's MediaSentry investigation — upon which Dr. Jacobson relies and the veracity of which he 'assumes' — was 'limited' and 'simplistic', failing to "resolve... relevant technical problems such as superpeer hopping, NAT translation, and firewall relaying....[failing to implement] "actual complete file transfer....simply [taking] filenames at face value and ...[failing to make] any correction for pollution on Kazaa [despite] [p]ollution levels [on Kazaa which] can be as high as 90% for some files....[not being aware of] the limitations of Kazaa in file searching.....[failing to take] computer hygiene precautions ..... [with respect to] multi-peer downloading contamination. Therefore, [making it] ... difficult to establish the contribution of the various IP-addresses ...[it being] possible that some IP-addresses contributed 0 Bytes to an actual download, [with] ... involvement [but] ...no actual contribution". The notice of designation of expert witness and his curriculum vitae are here."

Slashdot Top Deals

If you don't have time to do it right, where are you going to find the time to do it over?

Working...