I suspect the general problem is letting third parties publish packages in official distribution without any review.
Compare with Debian, where each package has a maintainer who's independent of that package's developer.
Much slower, yes, but when you don't need the bleeding edge, that stability is worth a lot.
Both the high and low speed winds produce a proton flux of 3 × 10^8 protons cm2 sec1 at 1 AU.
Assuming you can collect every proton that hits your surface, and that it's perfectly perpendicular to the sun (which won't be true on a rotating Moon), you could get 1 liter of H2O per 4.64 km^2 and 24 hours. Seems expensive.
3*10^12 protons / m^2 * s.
1 mole of water is 6.022*10^23 molecules, so 12.044*10^23 protons.
We assume we get the electrons for free.
1 mole of water is 18 mL.
So to gather 1 liter, we'd need 12.044*10^23 / 3*10^12 m^2 s
= 401,466,666,666 m^2 s
= 401*10^9 m^2 s
= 401*10^3 km^2 s
= 4.64 km^2 days
As technology improves, the race to the bottom moves forward.
The only viable solution I can imagine is UBI, but implementing that will require a working democracy.
€10.6 billion for 290 satellites? That's about €36.5 million per satellite.
The total cost of SpaceX's Starlink program is not known. The best number we have is from 2018, an estimate of $10 billion for the whole constellation. Assuming the estimate holds for the planned 12000 satellites, that's about $833k per satellite.
As things stand, I do not expect this European system to be profitable.
That's if you have only one password.
What they *should* have had is many accounts, each with its unique password, easily revokable.
But it does move! -- Galileo Galilei