Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Earth

Cooling the Planet With a Bubble Bath 219

cremeglace writes "A Harvard University physicist has come up with a new way to cool parts of the planet: pump vast swarms of tiny bubbles into the sea to increase its reflectivity and lower water temperatures. 'Since water covers most of the earth, don't dim the sun,' says the scientist, Russell Seitz, speaking from an international meeting on geoengineering research. 'Brighten the water.' From ScienceNOW: 'Computer simulations show that tiny bubbles could have a profound cooling effect. Using a model that simulates how light, water, and air interact, Seitz found that microbubbles could double the reflectivity of water at a concentration of only one part per million by volume. When Seitz plugged that data into a climate model, he found that the microbubble strategy could cool the planet by up to 3C. He has submitted a paper on the concept he calls “Bright Water" to the journal Climatic Change.'"
Hardware Hacking

Home-Built Turing Machine 123

stronghawk writes "The creator of the Nickel-O-Matic is back at it and has now built a Turing Machine from a Parallax Propeller chip-based controller, motors, a dry-erase marker and a non-infinite supply of shiny 35mm leader film. From his FAQ: 'While thinking about Turing machines I found that no one had ever actually built one, at least not one that looked like Turing's original concept (if someone does know of one, please let me know). There have been a few other physical Turing machines like the Logo of Doom, but none were immediately recognizable as Turing machines. As I am always looking for a new challenge, I set out to build what you see here.'"

Comment Re:Brakes (Score 1) 1146

Even better, you can shift the car into neutral while braking, or maybe even turn off the ignition and coast? I don't understand how people can't seem to think of these things. It's not like the car suddenly accelerated to 100mph in the blink of an eye; even in the more powerful cars, it still takes a few seconds to get up to speeds like that.

Submission + - SPAM: Star Trek communicator lives!

coondoggie writes: "The crew of the classic science-fiction show's Starship Enterprise wore small devices on their chests that they could tap to communicate instantly with their colleagues. Such communications technology is now closer to reality thanks to a Finnish company which this week demonstrated high-tech clothing that can send and receive messages via satellite.

The demonstrator antenna, built by the Patria Aviation Oy company, looks like a simple patch of cloth but is capable of operating in the Iridium and GPS frequency band as part of clothing. The Iridium satellites allow two-way voice and data communication, while GPS provides positional data to the user. Iridium could also relay the position of the user.

[spam URL stripped]"

Link to Original Source

Comment Re:Suppress innovation (Score 1) 282

Well on the bright side, any patent application that is merely a regular device that is "socially enabled", filed after IBM's application, can probably be easily rejected under 35 USC 103(a) using art that reads on the regular device, combined with IBM's art on a socially enabled device.

Comment Re:Fuck you blizzard (Score 1) 206

I really don't understand how the game experience is different between LAN and battle.net.

100Mbps (or even 1Gbps) connection between all the computers directly connected to one another, as opposed to a shared 10Mbps connection (that most likely gets nowhere near that, especially if it is Comcast or some crap) for the entire group of computers, in which each computer must communicate with the Battle.net server in order to receive information that is originating from another computer that is two feet away from it.

Comment Re:Whiplash. (Score 2, Interesting) 201

it's going to take a long time (both in ramping up the tech and in tasking the scope to just sit there and stare at a star, waiting for something to blip by) for the "earth-sized rock in the habitable zone with an earth-length orbital period!" announcements to start rolling in.

I wouldn't think that an "earth-length" orbital period is all that important to determining if a planet can support life or not. Remember, the type of the star it orbits determines where and how large the habitable zone will be, so if we find a planet relatively the same size as Earth orbiting a star that is not as hot as our sun, the habitable zone for this planet will be much closer to the star in question; thus the orbital period could possibly be much different than our own, depending on exactly how close that planet must be in order to sustain liquid water. Likewise, if an earth sized planet is found orbiting a star that burns much hotter than our sun, the habitable zone would be much farther away from that particular star, again resulting in a different orbital period from our own.

Slashdot Top Deals

The more cordial the buyer's secretary, the greater the odds that the competition already has the order.

Working...