Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Sharing the work load (Score 1) 149

Well, as I remember it, you were trying to commercialize the site. Not a single other person working on it was interested in that, lest it fall to the same fate as our beloved Slashdot. We were pushing hard to incorporate as a non-profit.

Regardless, you're right about one thing, He was ill suited for the role he took on.

Comment Re:Shocked that a company uses a product? (Score 4, Informative) 82

Access Manager is an extremely capable enterprise class single-sign-on product (It's the current incarnation of Novell's iChain SSO product). I'm using it here to protect about 30+ backed web-applications. I can do access restrictions based on LDAP group memberships, inject identity information in http headers, do behind the scenes form-fill login for applications that wouldn't know what SSO was if it fell on them and so much more. Currently just finished a Radius server integration for 2 factor auth. It's one of the two best pieces of enterprise software I've ever used. (Riverbed's Stingray appliance being the other).

Submission + - Red Hat welcomes CentOS to the family (redhat.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Red Hat, Inc, (NYSE: RHT), and the CentOS Project today announced they are joining forces to build a new CentOS, completing the whole Red Hat Linux story, from Fedora through RHEL to CentOS.

Comment Re:And I Will Stop Buying... (Score 1) 521

Yes, in the effort to make trucks more economical, they've really engineered out a of ruggedness. I can flex a body panel on any new truck by leaning on it. I can lean hundreds of pounds against my '81 Ford with no visible deflection in the panel. Its possible this is a way to actually address these concerns of people who use trucks have. Can we make things stronger and lighter at the same time? I'm cautiously optimistic that this won't suck and will actually make the trucks better.

Comment Re:Or Maybe... (Score 2) 175

Of course there is always the view that the language you "learn" with in school is largely irrelevant, learning how to develop software and solve problems is the skill. The underlying concepts are what's important, not that you understand the specific syntax of the language -- My undergrad program was taught *entirely* in Java -- I haven’t written a single line of Java code since graduation.

Comment Re:Emmissions (Score 1) 452

Second is that it is MUCH easier to control emission at the generating station than it is to try to do it on every tailpipe out there. Would you rather have one big filter or millions of small ones?

Of course it's much easier to control one point than many, but until the EPA gets serious about a carbon cap or other controls on the dirtiest power plants -- I'll stand by my argument.

Instead of coal you can power it with natural gas or even oil.

You *can*, but many folks don't have the option of choosing where their power comes from.

Comment Re:Have you actually driven a Model S? I have (Score 1) 452

'based on a Lotus Elise' would be the Tesla *Roadster* - which they haven't produced for a couple of years now. the car everyone is talking about in this story is the Model S, which is built from the ground up by Tesla as a pure electric vehicle, and is therefore a much more optimal solution.

you're right, mea culpa.

Comment Re:Have you actually driven a Model S? I have (Score 0) 452

Oh, I don't doubt that it's a fine electric automobile, based on a Lotus Elise, it would be hard to make it bad, however; the very concept of a battery car is what I take issue with, as a gear-head I have just a have a personal prejudice against.

Personal prejudices and preferences aside, my biggest issue with electric cars is that you're really just shuffling the emissions around. Instead of the source of pollution being from a very tightly regulated source (tail-pipe emissions), they are now likely to come from a largely unregulated and dirty power plant -- 42% us power came from coal in 2011. Until we get a point of 100% clean renewable energy, I'm not sure the trade-off is worth it.

Comment Re:All places I worked (Score 2) 113

Oh for a Mod point. This is exactly it.

Among the employees of a University, Faculty are the 1st class citizens. Us staff folks are not. We are subject to all the normal stuff that you would expect of any employer. Faculty just have a different relationship with their employer. Not making a judgment call on this, I'm just stating the reality of the situation.

As faculty, I would expect that my email would not be ready without my knowledge and that there would be some sort of committee to determine if HR had the right or reasonable cause to search my email before it happened.

As staff, every bit I generate is subject to search and inspection...including these made on "company time".

Comment Re:Here's a benchmark (Score 1) 380

Around here I pay $0.18 per kWH. My Server draws about 90W -- That's about $11-12 /month. My hardware was free, though I put a couple $$ worth of upgrades into it -- though, I havn't spent any money on hardware for it in the last 3 years. Also, the key to running your own stuff, is that you own it, which is something that's tough to put a price on, but I'd say has quite a high value.

Comment Re:seconed debian (Score 1) 281

Yeah, the job I just recently left, definitely still had some a few of these running in production. They were legacy systems, scheduled to be decommissioned within the next year or two...but still, not quite vintage.

My own "vintage" collection, is a mid 90's DEC 3000 running VMS 8.4, An HP ML370 G2, which runs my home network, network storage, email, and a some websites, Then there are the IBM XTs and 8-bit ataris, though they don't get much play these days.

Slashdot Top Deals

To be a kind of moral Unix, he touched the hem of Nature's shift. -- Shelley

Working...