Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:This is ridiculous. (Score 1) 633

Absolutely correct. Been there, done that, had the heart attack at 40.

As I was laying in the hospital bed, wired for sound, my then-five-year-old daughter came in to see me. I will never forget the look of horror on her face when she saw her Daddy laying there, looking like he was one step away from dead. I decided at that moment never to go back. I walked away from a six-figure income to a zero-figure income, got my life together, wrote a book, earned a PhD, and appreciate that there is more to life than working all the time, especially when it's only to make other people rich.

Comment Re:Who really owns student work. (Score 1) 208

It all depends on where you are, and what school you attend. I am completing a PhD in Canada at one of Canada's Tier 1 universities. I own the copyright to all my work, my notes, my essays, my papers (except those that have been published by a major journal), my blog posts, and my dissertation. And yes, I am funded by the university and a provincial agency.

To get my degree, I grant the university (and the National Library) a non-exclusive license to reproduce my thesis in their respective databases, but I hold the copyright. It even says so on the cover page. In fact, at my university, we even have the option to license it under Creative Commons (which I intend to do when/if I'm done).

The Courts

$74k Judgment Against Craigslist Prankster 182

jamie points out an update in the case of Jason Fortuny, the Craigslist prankster who was sued last year for publicly posting responses to a fake personal ad. The Citizen Media Law Project's summary of his case now includes a recently entered default judgment (PDF), fining Fortuny "... in the amount of $35,001.00 in statutory damages for Count I, violation of the Copyright Act; $5,000 in compensatory damages for Count II, Public Disclosure of Private Facts, and Count III, Intrusion Upon Seclusion." He has also been ordered to pay more than $34,000 in attorney and court fees.

Comment Re:Why not Canadians? (Score 1) 248

The reason this doesn't apply to Canadians has to do with cross-border transport of both finished goods and raw materials. Truckers from both Canada and the U.S. routinely cross the border to minimize transportation distance (among other things, like providing just-in-time inventory supply). Doing the whole fingerprint/photograph thing would interfere significantly with commerce and manufacturing in both countries, so that's why the exception.

Slashdot Top Deals

Whoever dies with the most toys wins.

Working...