if I recall correctly, mostly republicans, but they were covering their backs by funding this somehow

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=images&tbs=rl%3A1&q=site%3Asimple.wikipedia.org&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai= Basic 28% Intermediate 55% Advanced 16% I think someone didn't live up to his claims!

But I believe it'd be better if their own services didn't display as a result and more as a "hey look your favorite search engine has something for that" kind of thing

Ain't that huge already by pollution "standards"?

This is a frighteningly accurate representation of internet scientific articles Not that I complain though, these archetypes are always interesting to read

I'm pretty sure archive.org said at some point they'd take over URL shorteners which would go dead, so those billions of pests wouldn't all go 404 on our asses