Change for two cents? (Score 1)

If there are 'super-beings', they are likely both unaware and indifferent to us and are likely no less responsible for the creation of astrophysics as we are responsible for quantum physics. If you consider that our bodies are made up of nothing more than mass collections of subatomic particles arranged into atoms, which are arranged into molecules, which are arranged into DNA, which is then correspondingly mapped to our tissue, as 'super-being' could potentially exist, but our entire universe would then serve as something as inconsequential as an atom, with our concept of a multiverse serving as a vast array of 'mega-atoms' that could on a vast enough scale using models of physics we cannot fully observe or appreciate, culminate into something we would consider a 'celestial super-being'. Such a being may be as relatively inconsequential as we are to it... we are small minded creatures that barely exist.. we are living on a grain of dust amidst a vast explosion.. the universe is 'expanding' / exploding as we speak at incredible speeds, yet thanks to distance, scale, and relativity - we perceive much of our own reality as static or in incredible slow-motion. All of our current advances can be attributed to our society acting as a mass-collective of intelligence...Our 'Giants' standing on the shoulders of giants before them.. one genius making a tremendous breakthrough by continuing the work of his predecessors. Individually, we are ignorant, unremarkable, and blind, which is why we so desperately cling to simplistic explanations that ignore observation, logic, and scientific method in favor of superstitious cults we call religion. No offense is intended, but reality is if anything incredibly indifferent to our beliefs and desires.