That doesnâ(TM)t sound like a valid analogy to me. âoePay for priorityâ sounds more like allowing some customers to pay $150/mo for gigabit internet largely built with taxpayer dollars while others just canâ(TM)t afford or justify the additional expense.

Net neutrality is more like a making a rule that exclusively allows Honda cars in the âoepay for priorityâ lane because they paid the transportation department off. Few would buy a Kia even if they were amazing because everybody wants to be home earlier and Kias take too long to get there. Furthermore, Kia would never be able to buy there way into that lane because they can never earn quite enough money to afford it. Honda becomes the de facto car and is difficult to unseat from their position of power. To me, thatâ(TM)s net neutrality.

I completely agree that it is now tradition that presidents fire all the attorneys that an opposing predecessor has appointed. I also agree that president Obama did exactly that. It seems natural that a president wants to promote their agenda and attorneys help do that.

I believe you are incorrect about President Trump/ Attorney General Sessions having fired only half of the remaining Obama attorneys. In fact, the 46 asked to resign represented all of the remaining appointees of President Obama. The other 47 had already stepped aside to make way for new picks.