...You do realize Obama wasn't President until January 2009, right? He had nothing to do with what happened in 2008 (aside from his role as 1 senator out of 100).

That's the real news here. Who browses LinkedIn for anything other than employer/employee hunting?

I used to work there. It's not a timer (unless they changed it since I left, but I highly doubt it, since they use the same system to track internal operating metrics for planning staffing patterns). They are entering info every step of the way, except 'entering' info mostly means hitting the enter key on the computer at that station. One station at the make line when it goes in the over, one when it comes out of the oven and gets boxed, one when it goes out the door with the driver

All of the scenarios listed in the summary are basic errors by employees in the restaurant's workflow. Or, in some cases, fraud by managers trying to game their times to qualify for bonuses.

Way to butcher that joke.

You are daft if you still don't think the NSA is recording everything you do. They may not look at it, but they have it.

It's whatever the dipshit in front of you can (mis)remember from the manual at that exact moment.

That was the angriest "I hate you and I agree" post I've ever read.

Dude, chill out. Have a lood or something.

I think both the underwear and shoe bombers were clearly not all there.

The Tsarnaev brothers? No, not stupid. And notice, they didn't bother trying to get through airport security.

Um, you may be more than a little out of touch with the world outside your mom's basement.

I can think of at least two without really trying...

I know the irony of this escapes you, but it made me laugh.

Tbf, socialist fire departments haven't been saving them forever.

Back in "the good ol' days" when America was still great, two competing entrepeneurs would show up at your burning house and haggle with you while your house burned. If you didn't pay quick enough, they'd just loot the ruins and be on their way.

No, you're thinking of deductions. Credits are exactly what the article says. Credits are rare. Refundable credits (credits that pay even if greater than your tax burden) are even more rare. Deductions are common.

Article is about a regular, non-refundable tax credit. Not a deduction.

Do they even have source code? I thought it was all chewing gum, baling wire, and gerbils....

You are inventing a problem where none exists. While you're whinging about "should" and "should not" the rest of us will be over here in reality.

Reality: It doesn't matter who "pays" the liability because the owner of the car pays it anyway. The cost is passed on. Since the system we have already does this, why change it?

You need insurance as the owner of the car.

No different than a business owner needs insurance on their company cars, even if they're not driving it.

THIS IS NOT NEW.

No you don't. You just need insurance and actuaries to calculate and charge for the risks--which is exactly how we handle car accident deaths already.

Nothing new is needed to deal with self-driving car liabilities. It's a solved problem. I will never understand why people cling to this idea that it's not.