"Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."
-- Pablo Picasso (unsourced)

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Picasso

I don't understand. They seem to be setting up two static, plane electric fields at some angle to one another. Surely the resultant field is just another field at a different angle? Say the two fields are E and J , with
E = ( E , 0 , 0 )
J = ( 0 , J , 0 )
Then you've just got the resultant field, E' = E + J , where
E' = ( E , J , 0 )
which is just another static, plane electric field. So, given that two fields are really equivalent to one, if you set up just the resultant field in the first place, would this motor effect still occur?
What am I missing?

I've not heard of this twin-black-hole theory... Any references?

As for black hole mergers, progress is being made: http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/starsgalaxies/gwave.html .

And what of the 'sides' of the galaxy? Are these the two ends of the galaxy's axis, or on the disc on opposite sides? In either case, due to the symmetries involved, I don't think what you say makes any sense.

Why is this modded +5 Interesting?

I think transami was confusing ad nauseam with reductio ad absurdum.

Are you implying most here have seen evidence of real, dead females? Yikes.