Re:People listen to politicians (Score 1)

What exactly is that link of yours, anyway? What is your relation to it?

From the page:

Conclusion: The Danger of "Gay Rights"
...
I am writing this conclusion to the third edition on the same day that President Bill Clinton has called for "hate crimes" legislation based on "sexual orientation" (code words for homosexuality). A few days ago, in an act unprecedented in the history of the presidency, Mr. Clinton aligned himself with the homosexual cause at a fund-raiser for the Human Rights Campaign Fund, the "gay" movement's largest political action committee.
...
Those whose perceptions of the "gay" movement have been shaped primarily by the popular media may find President Clinton's actions appropriate, even laudable. Such people have been persuaded that "gays" are society's victims in need of protection. But the "gay" movement I have seen and investigated is neither benign, nor are its members "victims." It is vicious, deceptive and enormously powerful. Its philosophy is Machiavellian and its tactics are (literally) Hitlerian.
...
"Gay" political power derives in large part from the public perception that homosexuals are victims. As Kirk and Pill so baldly admitted in The Overhauling of Straight America, "gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of protector." What would happen to the protective instinct of Americans if they knew that many of the worst villians of the Third Reich were "gay"? How closely would America scrutinize the "gay" agenda if "homoeroticism" were revealed as the very foundation of Nazism?
...
If the facts in this book are true, and if it is also true that the "gatekeepers" of our public information are deliberately keeping these facts from us, can we hope to educate our fellow citizens before the "gay agenda" plunges this nation into social chaos?
...
Have we exaggerated the urgency of our task? I think not. The future of America, indeed of civilization itself, depends upon the preservation of the natural family -- God's model for effective human society and the training ground for healthy human relationships. Yet the goal of the "gay" movement is the devaluation of the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic (monogamous heterosexual family-centered marriage) and its replacement with a "gay" affirming pagan alternative.
...
"Gay" strategists choose to employ the biological model of homosexuality for the dual purpose of denying choice and escaping responsibility. In calling for research into a so-called "gay" gene, their purpose was never to cure or rectify, but to justify homoerotic conduct and the homosexual identity. "Gays" correctly reason that if sexual behavior is a choice, it carries with it both responsibility and accountability. Their insistence that homosexuality is "not a choice" functions to bring ever more recruits into the "gay" fold and keep them there by discouraging them from seeking change.
...
Pragmatically, Playboy (that is, all pornography) manifests a blatant homosexual ethos. Its heterophobia is sustained by an utilitarian analysis of Playboy images and philosophy. It is not too much to say, that just as the imagery of stained glass windows and holy cards once initiated, instructed and indoctrinated potential adherents in a religious faith, the didactic images in "soft" and "hard" pornography similarly initiate, instruct and indoctrinate potential believers in the tenants of its religion, its homosexual morality.
...
It follows that the current generation of fatherless youth may be prime candidates for homosexual recruitment. And the same amoral thinking which allows them to consider homosexuality as a "normal" option may also make them dangerously susceptible to the next Hitler.

Do you really believe this bullshit?