Study funded by wind farms and "climate change" hoaxes no doubt. Wind is either getting stronger or weaker and they can say whatever they want since their results can't be proven or dis-proven. I would not spend any of my money on wind turbines, a waste of money.

When you post every little thing you do on Twitter or Facebook, I would think people are wanting to be tracked.

Tesla price could go up some before correcting down as a stock always does. But it could also keep climbing over the next few weeks.

Hard for me to decide because Tesla still has a lot of room to go up.

This isn't even the first female spacewalk, it is the first all-female spacewalk. All article makes people think is "must be harder for females to spacewalk then men"

Hardest part is programing the software. Could have been done decades ago if someone wanted to make the program.

But how do they know the AI didn't make any mistakes? What if the humans were right and the program wrong?

Ahead in what way? Tesla is already outselling China's biggest EV maker BYD, but it will take a second gigafactory to beat them in just Chinese sales which will be a few years away from building.

Building a factory in China does open up Tesla to the car market in China. China does not allow outside companies to import their goods for the most part.

China's biggest EV maker sales have been declining the last few months, maybe because people decided to wait and get a Tesla instead of the others.

Next up for Tesla is a Europe gigafactory.

Just like Climate change, this is a false crises. If someone has been without a job for 5 years, it is because they don't want to work. If automation is replacing jobs, more jobs are being created right now to replace them in the great Trump economy.

There is nothing to fear about automation, it is just the next big change like the industrial age, some jobs will be automated and new job sectors will replace them.

I have seen so many "Fact checkers" that have been wrong that I don't trust any group that fact checks anymore. The fact checkers are just as political as the media.

How good can a fact-checker be if they are fact-checking satire?

It does not matter, it makes no difference. Absolutely none, only thing this does is make people feel better.

Renewable energy is limited, all the energy it produces get used, then all the required energy comes from oil, gas, coal... etc. So they using only "clean" energy means the people who used that energy before, will now be using oil, gas, coal. Not that it matters, all that energy is in the same power grid.

How long until the 33 billion start making google money? that should be the main focus. The whole carbon thing only matters to people who believe in climate change.

I never paid attention to any badge thing. I'm not even sure where to look to find it, or maybe nothing I watch has a badge.

For political stuff, I know anything with a badge can't be trusted since they will not badge any channel pro-trump or Republican.

Yep, they always look at past data, and change it because they think it was bad data. The problem with models is you put bad data in and you get bad data out. I don't trust any of these studies until other scientists look at how they did their study. These people are paid to get the desired results, if they don't get the results they get paid for, they are fired.

I will continue to not believe it since all predictions have been wrong, and all the studies have had false or edited data. I find it more likely that climate change is just a way for politicians to get rich.

Electric cars is the reason why I see investments in non-renewable energy a good investment. Power consumption is going to really go up as more and more electric cars are being driven.

The site the study comes from pushes clean energy and pushes the climate change hoax. It is likely a paid study to get the result they want as must studies are.

If people are investing money into natural gas and gas lines, then I would trust they know more then this place does.

They are lucky they didn't get his tax returns, instead of 2 years, they would have gotten many more years in jail. All for some tax returns that no one really cares about. It would not matter if they sent to MSM without a name, it would have been easy to track it back to them.

The real goal isn't reducing greenhouse emissions, the real goal is line the pockets of the politicians. Pour money into solar/wind, and they pour that money back to the politicians. The Democrats don't make money from nuclear power, so they will always be against it.

The most important point of keeping it open is lower energy costs. We are going to need more nuclear power plants as more people buy electric cars, otherwise we will be burning coal/oil to make electricity to power the cars. Does not matter as for as the climate change hoax, but nuclear power would be cheaper.

having a "like" button is pointless if there is no "dislike" button. Any site that does not have a "dislike" option, I just ignore the "like".

I don't even bother reading any news on facebook, most of it just pro-Democrat propaganda that facebook wants to promote.