Did you even read the parent post?

The parent poster said nothing about knowledge.

Most states have what are called "wiretapping" laws which are different than 4th amendment protections and vary from state to state.

That is not how privacy and recording/wiretapping laws work. Otherwise anyone could post a sign in a bathroom and record you doing your business.

Did you see the star wars prequil episode 2?

First you create the problem. (in this case immigration of a large percentage of barbaric males who are religiously justified to rape underaged girls because their holy text says it's ok)

Then you offer the solution to the problem you created! And that solution includes an unchecked blanket increase in authority with a simultaneous reduction in liberty of the citizenry.

We all know what happens next. History is chock-fucking-full of examples.

Lets make no mistake here, when the article mentions nation states intentionally sabotaging the cables and ships "dragging their anchors", these two things are one and the same.

Russia and China have been caught repeatedly destroying undersea cables by dragging anchors "accidentally". There is no "accidentally" dragging an anchor any considerable distance.

These cables are designed to be robust and long lasting (because replacement is expensive and a pain in the ass). Any damage is almost always intentional.

You mean the police panicking, and then shooting up the homeowners...

No matter what, the police are not our (us citizens') friends. They exist only to extort revenue and threaten compliance in the populace.

We should question every new tool they receive and understand how they will abuse it, just like they've done everything else.

I absolutely hate how they can arrest and detain without any measurable quantifier for DUI or speeding. Literally they just get to make shit up and courts back them.

I'm willing to bet the bricking is due to a security vulnerability with regard to IoT access to the camera OR to sabotage anyone elses ability too look into passive data collection they weren't supposed to be doing.

I recall a Cyber Security event put on by the FBI in 2014.

One of the things that stuckwith me is the point they made about vector for the most infected / hijacked electronic device genre in the world, which turned out to be "smart" TV's, refrigerators, washing machines and other home appliances that should have never had access to the internet.

Another thing that theypointed out, that I later learned in college when taking some EE classes related to the car canbus, is how little to non-existent most manufacturersdo to implementcyber security in their devices.

Case in point the 2013 Target Credit Card POS breach.

Yes. So the college admission programs have taken to judging applicants in such a way that it leaves no paper trail and is completely subjective. I.E. via extra curricular stuff.

https://asianamericanforeducat...

No. Only one side is against this. Democrats in CA are very much for affirmative action (aka: racism)

IIRC in legal theory for liability, they call this the "empty chair" tactic. Where each defendant points to an "empty chair" aka, a party not involved in the dispute and lays culpability to this non-party. If everyone confront then points to the "empty chair" they can shirk responsibility.

That's the justification. The reality is it's cheaper to fuck over and exploit your employees than be fair and equitable to them. And HR allows you to do that WHILE protecting you from the resulting lawsuits...

No. It's the tortious act of unlawful/false imprisonment, (at least in California).

Kidnapping requires the a force component (real or implicit) as the means of coercion.

As the title says, what was the impact on the neighbors, other than shit going on somewhere else ?