I'm getting pretty tired of companies offering "Services" or "licensing" for physical items that are for mass consumer purchase.

What's next, Nike requiring you to pay a monthly fee to buy a shirt?

This has been known for a while now...

And surprise! Youtube is completely opaque on how it handles takedown notices, despite facilitating and allowing fake DMCA takedown extortion rackets to fleece it's creators.

All the Hasbro CEO cares about is higher profit margins. He gets a lot of pushback against AI from the WotC crew who refuse to allow any of it in D&D or MTG.

You do realize that your premise has been thoroughly debunked and that your interpretation is completely made up?

Which is why if you asked Alexa for reasons NOT to vote trump, it would give a list.

Error = bullshit.

Or... not quite done with but destroy prematurely.

Didn't they let a suspect of an investigation willingly and knowingly destroy evidence, and then give them immunity after the fact?

Don't know why you're labeled troll and not insightful...

No, what SCOTUS doesn't like is federal agencies passing policy as if it had the weight of law. Thus bypassing congress's ability to legislate.

Federal Agencies like to exercise their bureaucratic power by redefining things, altering definitions, etc, to increase their scope of authority by casting a wider net. Thus granting themselves more authority than they actually have. THAT is what SCOTUS has been stripping away from federal agencies.

All of this is maintenance that should have been done but has been put off.

EVEN IF all of the power lines in CA were upgraded, we still don't have enough power generation to charge a quarter of the proposed amount of EV's.

People who make comparisons between MAGA (or anything, really) and Nazi's are idiots who call everything they disagree with as "nazi like".

You mean, when they find him with a bullet wound to the back of the head, handcuffed with his hands behind his back, zipped up inside a suitcase, in the trunk of a car that a train ran over, then once he's declared dead via suicide, will they drop the charges (secretly).

Banning books, is not the same as refusal to spend public funds and include a book in a public school library.

Everyone gets up in arms when they hear the words "banning books" when the reality is that graphically sexual and non-age appropriate books are being denied purchase in primary school libraries.

These are not the same things.

It's purpose is not to help with this investigation.

It's purpose is to generate justification for further searches and violation of privacy to anyone and everyone.

A piece of metal can do the same thing...