Or in this case, harm reduction.

Sounds like he's realized the climate is screwed and we are completely incapable of thinking far enough ahead to do anything about it.
As the effects of climate change continue to appear, we can address them on a case-by-case basis...if those effects directly involve anything we care about right now.

Meanwhile we should forget about fixing the root cause and apply our efforts where they might have some effect.

My employer already knows whether i am in the office or wfh.
Most other jobs seem like they would as well.

Recording over time and later studying the actual prices from the real-world subject (Amazon) would be in situ.
Relying on self-reported info from that same clearly biased subject is just an unreliable study.

"C.AI argued that because her son signed up for the service at the age of 15, it bound her to the platform's terms"
Seems like they just admitted there is no contract.

The world we've built is built for our shape -- bipedal, upright. While specialist shapes can be useful in limited circumstances, a bipedal human-shaped robot would be adaptable to the world that already exists.

In the end, the auto maker took his domain name.
Wait not in the end actually I just checked it he got the domain back but only after he died.

Not necessary. I could clearly hear Gene Wilder's voice as I read it.

It doesn't, actually. The official description from the IEC says:

Emphasis mine. The standard test for IPX7 is submersion in still water to a depth of 1 meter for 30 minutes. IPX8 is "better than that". Apple, Google, Samsung, etc. all define how much better on their own. CNBC has an excellent video explainer on what exactly all this means.

These companies are designing to protect against people dropping their phone in the toilet, or maybe a kiddie pool. And yeah, as called out in the CNBC video, the advertising is very deceptive and unfair.

Alfalfa and Spanky had the he-man woman-hater's club. We have these two atrocities.
bleah.

I'm aware of how they handle the recall. My 2 year anniversary with my Ioniq 6 was last Friday. (No more free EA DCFC for me.)

My point was the total number of cars that were repaired after an ICCU failure is very small. Lots of manufacturers have recalls, including for parts that can cause a vehicle to stop running. Ford is the worst. Every vehicle lineup has their issues, so just putting it in perspective.

2 years for me, no ICCU issues. No charging issues. They did replace my interior door panels under warranty for peeling clear coat.

A tiny number of cars, but with very vocal responses because gotta drive them clicks!

Statistically, just 1% of the roughly 200,000 vehicles involved in the recall can have their ICCUs fail, which is 2,000 cars. Out of all the cars that are part of the latest recall for the failing ICCU, 41,137 Hyundai and Genesis EVs have already been fixed by Jan. 22, while another 14,828 Kia EV6s have had the remedy applied. Motor Trend concurred in a recent look at the issue: "Itâ(TM)s a big deal, but not one that individual E-GMP owners are statistically likely to face."

And have it shut down/removed from dns with no transparency or due process?
No risk of abuse here, nope not at all.

Nope, it was in Australia.

IIRC, it was in Canada. There was a lawsuit because the babies produced from the embryos would inherit an estate. anyhow, here it is...

NYT robot filter blocks the article.