Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Federal wire-tapping charges (Score 1) 272

Because the homeowners installed the wiretap themselves. They paid money for it and plugged it up. Now, did they realize they were installing a listening device in their own home? Nah, they were stupid, like most the people buying these things.

Comment Re:Fact checking (Score 1) 123

Suppose for the sake of argument, that Facebook's fact checking were like nothing ever seen in history. Relentless pursuit of absolute, unbiased truth. We'd still see comments like the above... and worse, we'd see people who begin watching for the Facebook "not a fact" ruling in order to proudly believe and promote those articles more.

Facebook would then label anything posted by ANY media source as false then. CNN, Fox, ABC, NY Times, etc. They all put their own spin on news to get attention.

Comment Re:Voting booths are not the bottleneck. (Score 1) 287

I live in the north east part of town currently, I lived over in Lexington before that. There is a huge difference in how the voting is handled on each side of town. The major reason for that is the elections are run by a local commission, and that commission is appointed by the local politicians. Over in Lexington, the election commission was appointed by Republicans, over in Richland it was appointed by Democrats. Even worse, after the HUGE issue in the 2012 election in Richland, the person in charge, Lillian McBride, resigned and was re-hired at nearly the same salary in another position. Corruption is rampant in Richland, the polling places that were for the penny sales tax had plenty of machines, the ones against it were short. It's all about the money.

Comment Re:Abolish Software Patents (Score 3, Interesting) 104

While I generally disagree with software patents in general, using these as an example may be a poor choice. Looking at the 3 patents in question this seems more an example of how overworked the patent system as a whole is. There are numerous cases of prior art of these patents, which all seem variations on a single patent just as reissues. This is an example of patents that never should have been granted in the first place based on the prior art in place. Only someone totally out of touch would think sandboxing was a novel concept in 2009 when the original patent was issued.

Slashdot Top Deals

Professional wrestling: ballet for the common man.

Working...