Comment Re:I hope this surprises no one,.. (Score 1) 68
Comment Re:What? (Score 1) 45
Comment Re:$507.03 (Score 2) 150
Comment I want my games to have all the pixels! (Score 5, Insightful) 559
Submission + - NASA Testing Frickin' Laser Communications (itworld.com)
Comment The alternative (Score 5, Insightful) 492
Comment Viscosity (Score 2) 350
wolves are less viscous
Oh my! If wolves are less viscous, I think that makes them much more terrifying than hyenas. I don't like the idea of fluid(ish) animals sneaking up on me.
Comment Re:Democracy has failed (Score 1) 569
Comment Edison = Jobs (Score 5, Informative) 692
Comment Results (Score 5, Insightful) 537
Comment Re:Congress considers Snowdon to be a whistleblowe (Score 1) 531
Comment Re:non sequitur (Score 1) 780
Comment Re:Don't they have to understand the case? (Score 1) 169
No, we assume that every word in any Bible anyone can read is false because it is complete bollocks..."
The NT (Gospels in particular) can be seen as a reasonable historical account. There would be no reason for the authors (Mathew, Mark, Luke, and John) to reword things like what Jesus said. Can we reasonably assume that to the best of their memory, that is what he said? Yes we can. Especially since we take other authors words on far less controversial topics that were written hundreds of years afterwards instead of just 30. http://www.reasonablefaith.org/establishing-the-gospels-reliability