Re:Legit (Score 1)

I'm inclined to disagree with any kind of structure in a free information medium like the internet. The seemingly arbitrary and random nature of the internet is a breeding ground for the kind of inginuity that creates new technology like bittorrent and podcasting and such. (read: open and unordered architecture allows unlimited numbers of organization, allowing multiple formats to 'evolve' from the medium simultaneously, rather than one determined form of order.) Additionally structure requires a certain tech background which limits the numbers of people involved, which in terms reduces the effectiveness of free information flow. I say leave the backbone as simple as possible. Google and such will adapt by ceating more efficient algorithms (or be replaced by those who do). For example, the most advanced computing system on the planet is sitting on your neck, where on the backbone of seemingly unordered and chaotic array of neurons is converted by a probability function of sorts into all the myriad of wonders of your brain. I can think of no better system to model.