Re:www.goatse.kids (Score 1)

I just had my first kid, a beautiful baby girl and let me say that after seeing that site, weell, let's just say I won't be signing her up for any beauty pageants.

I mean its just *blatant*, ugg. The thing that bothers me is that they restrict honest normal porn sites but allow something like that, which is preteen erotica posing as "fanclub" if I've ever seen it.

The question is, is it worth having governmental control over *all* sites in order to ensure that sites like this aren't allowed? Or do you believe that the site, as sick as it is, should be allowed?

In that case, where do you draw the line between the merely "weird" and the downright "chilling"? As remarked in a previous post, its the fringe cases that are the hardest to determine...

I believe in freedom of speech and expression, but there are some things that shouldn't be expressed - ever. And when it comes to kids, frankly, why not just make it illegal for pictures of *any* children, whatsoever (except in conjunction with "legitimate" scientific/medical or public record keeping) to appear on an internet site without express approval from a designated authority? Because it opens the doors to further regulation of the Internet community, is the common answer - and perhaps it does. Just because the door is opened doesn't mean we have to plunge through it.

Just my .02.