Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Now that the station is up there... (Score 1) 133

...can't they just lower some ropes and chains and pull up materials? We do it all the time in my treehouse. Seems easier than launching these dangerous shuttles.

Sure you can! If you can speed up whatever you want to bring to the space station to 17,500 mph, then they'll bring it up on a rope for you, because that's how fast they're going :) It's deceptive when you watch a launch because the shuttle looks like it's going thousands of miles into space, but it's really only going a few hundred miles up. Most of the fuel is spent on horizontal change in velocity so that it can reach a speed necessary to continuously "fall off the edge of the earth". The ISS is going so fast that it orbits the earth every 90 minutes. Compare that with how long it takes for a flight from California to New York (several hours) and you'll see just how amazing the ISS and Shuttle are :)

Comment Re:Dissapointing (Score 2) 179

Why do they insist on capsules? Why not take the advice of someone from FPA; build it at the space station and design it to refuel/load from there, eliminating the need to return to earth? We still have to get things up to the ISS, but that'll be left to the Russians and their superior rockets. We can take over 'space exploration' by just skipping that part. "Oh but what if they don't want to help us shuttle our crew/items up to the ISS one day?" No worries, Virgin and Japan/other countries are working on that! So we'll find one way or another to get to the ISS.

I think for the same reason the Space Shuttle can't visit BOTH the Hubble Telescope and the Space Station in one trip is the same reason why you wouldn't ever have a ship from beyond low earth orbit return to dock at the Space Station...the necessary changes in velocity would require too much fuel. Picture this: the ISS is orbiting earth at 17,000 mph, while the Apollo craft had to reach speeds of 25,000 mph to go to the moon. You don't just get to slow down for free in space, so would you rather launch your rocket from earth to bring more mass (computers, moon buggies, test equipment, etc.) to your destination? Or would you rather use fuel as that mass so you can slow down from deep space to dock at the station?

Slashdot Top Deals

If you can't learn to do it well, learn to enjoy doing it badly.

Working...