Comment Re:*Sigh* How many of you actually read the bill? (Score 1) 443
You raise very good points.
The original intent of my post was to vent my exasperation at the posts claiming that this was a 1st amendment issue. Specifically the posts whining about not be able to say "fuck" and so on. Those posts are just way off topic.
Number one is a problem I agree, and thanks to your post I see why.
However, your second numbered item is a generalization. Its not forcing the registration of online handles of "those the government deems undesirable". It would force the registration of online handles of convicted sex offenders and only convicted sex offenders. Also, I'd wager that sex offenders (especially pedo's) belong to the very small set of things/people in this world that are universally found to be undesirable.
The original intent of my post was to vent my exasperation at the posts claiming that this was a 1st amendment issue. Specifically the posts whining about not be able to say "fuck" and so on. Those posts are just way off topic.
Number one is a problem I agree, and thanks to your post I see why.
However, your second numbered item is a generalization. Its not forcing the registration of online handles of "those the government deems undesirable". It would force the registration of online handles of convicted sex offenders and only convicted sex offenders. Also, I'd wager that sex offenders (especially pedo's) belong to the very small set of things/people in this world that are universally found to be undesirable.
