That was beautiful,

But how does everyone gets to decide? They vote on what constitutes toxic behavior? Can everyone vote?
Many mediums already allow for such a system, for instance in this very discussion We can flag comments as inappropriate. I don't know how it works, but I believe that if several people mark a post as inappropriate it might be removed or edited in a way or another.

I also fail to see how disagreeing with your point of view disempowers other groups, even if they are wrong, or not, that you are defending, or not, mass censorship.

Some things sound simple when loosely explained, yet are deviously trick to implement.

Kilometer per hour.

Which study? If you refer to the one posted in the title above that we are discussing here, then it does not differentiate vegetable matter from cow matter.

That said there's probably no comparing the amount produced by cows and that from "leftover vegetable matter", since you need to feed a cow for ~3 years with vegetable matter that turns into farts before said cow turns into meat.

Agreed, and the knowledge about some materials producing electricity from light exposure dates back from the 19th century.

I don't think they do. They cite other articles in the beginning of their first paragraph and it seems like this is very novel knowledge.

I also didn't get how it works (to me chemistry was always the hardest subject), however I think the bacteria isn't present in the device, only the nanowires they produced. The gadget recharging seems to be physicochemical in nature.
Whatever the recharging method, they tested it continuously for 2 months. For a new technique it looks very promising.

I don't know if it actually condensates water (I didn't find mention to it, but I'm quite tired).

But it requires water vapor to work, same way that a wind turbine requires wind.
In a windy region it does not run out of wind easily. Same with water vapor.

Once upon a time almost all energy sources were inefficient.
It takes some iterations of optimization before a new tech is largely available.
Right now this is a very promising result.

FFS, I can't even consider you MAGAt assholes human anymore, you are just some fucking vile subspecies, nothing more than troglodytes with an intelligence only slightly higher than a dog's

Dehumanization is a clear red flag on the shaping of hate movements. We must be careful on what we may be turning ourselves into.
"Less than Human"

I challenge that view.

If potheads can grow weed underground with artificial lighting, future humans will probably have far more advanced techniques at their disposal.
Not infinite, but a much larger number then expected by current knowledge.

It ain't that simple, but CO2 fertilization is a thing. And the world is greener thanks to that.

Check Peñuelas et al, 2016 and Mao et al, 2013.

It doesn't mean climate change is a good thing. Also doesn't mean it is bad.
Truth is we don't know precisely how things will change and that's what scares most people.

Not meddling into the rest of the discussion.
But the maps are not for a single year(2014). They have a slider underneath it that allows you to explore it across several years.

Maybe the aliens are machines? From a different dimension, traveling through time, to deliver a pizza.

Ordered through an app

That's an interesting point.

Try reading, if you haven't already, "The Gods Themselves" by Isaac Asimov.
You might find it entertaining.

I agree. People are having it backwards assuming not having kids is a sacrifice.

Childs use humongous amounts of personal resources. Tons of time and money. Properly educating children is a huge sacrifice and a gift for the future of humankind.

Carbon taxes/markets. The major failure from the 2019 United Nations Climate Change Conference.

If I could, I would mod you up.