Comment Re:We've had a similar case here in NL (Score 1) 368
The question is: why oh why do all of these people go back to fscking Iran ?!
The draw of checking Iran's filing system is a powerful force indeed
The question is: why oh why do all of these people go back to fscking Iran ?!
The draw of checking Iran's filing system is a powerful force indeed
replacement parts, and that means mines, chemical plants, machine shops, factories and chip-fabrication facilities.
these are all valid concerns if the station is to stand on its own, aren't they? A university is going a bit too far but isn't maintaining the system keeping everyone alive without shipments from Earth a major part of "self sustaining"? comparing legitimate concerns to chain stores and restaurants is absurd. There's also the fact that, as mentioned elsewhere, we have yet to establish even an experimental biosphere that hasn't catastrophically failed, right here on this planet where it won't kill everyone involved if it doesn't work. That isn't to say we should give up, but right now colonizing another planet seems to be legitimately beyond our means. There are tons of intermediary steps necessary to make a system that will work indefinitely, and rushing it will only increase the chance of failure. This is not a computer program, it has to work the first time, all the time, forever, no mistakes. People have been working on the problems of space travel for quite some time, and no matter how much money or effort you throw at it, it is unlikely to succeed without a better understanding of how ecological systems work here on Earth. If we screw up a system that has worked without us for millions of years how could we possibly establish another one somewhere else? If you want to compare it to airplanes, it wasn't possible to go beyond simple gliders that would eventually crash until internal combustion engines that were both light and fast enough to allow flight were in place, and our current technology involving self sustaining ecological systems is more like one of these than the engines in even the earliest airplanes.
The idea that something should be legal because it is usually used for legal means and only in exceptions for illegal ones is one of the past.
Is anyone else bothered by how something this is always given in an authoritative tone in these types of posts when it is meant either sarcastically or to incite people to act? How long until people just start taking it as fact? Didn't Goebbels say something about repeating a lie often enough? It is getting to the point where I can't tell outrage from acceptance anymore in a lot of these posts.
There's got to be more to life than compile-and-go.