Folks mostly think of cost of launch, radiating heat, and building the satellites and conclude it's cheaper to build on Earth. If everything was equal, it would be. However, it's regulations that kill you. EACH DC needs to run the gauntlet of federal, state and local government with massive NIMBY incurred by outside agitators. Meanwhile, orbit is an FCC bulk permit and a launch permit. Once you've done one they're routine and easy to plan for. I don't think we'll see a million DC's in space anytime soon, but they will exist and they will be useful. The right answer is "somewhere in between."

So if someone makes more than you, they're stealing from you? Do I understand this correctly?

You're wrong. There's a huge amount of energy, materials, and new production in orbit, on the moon, and in asteroids. SpaceX is opening that up. There is literally NOBODY stopping you from doing this exactly as Musk did. In fact, we *need* more companies to do this so if you think you're smart enough, take a go at it. This is the opening of a whole new frontier, and there's pretty much room for everyone. The stock valuation isn't the big news, the fact that we've gotten to the point where we can start to value this massive opportunity is. A lot of folks are going to do really well in this.

Musk didn't take any money from you or reduce your potential prosperity at all. It's not a zero sum game.

Not disagreeing on that either. However, it's estimated the nurses spend more time on paperwork than on patient care. We're going to have to automate to the limit to get costs down, and provide more transparent pricing.

Folks, people are *expensive*. Really expensive. If you want less expensive healthcare, we're going to need to implement a lot of AI to handle the paperwork which is a huge time sink. If you have a problem with a healthcare professional knowing things that have to be noted, you have two options: 1. Don't go to get care. 2. Don't talk about those things. And certainly don't look at how much your insurance company knows because the law gives them full access.

Ignore the haters, they don't understand the politics for this. I used to design industrial Ethernet networks for a large vendor, and we spent quite a bit of time pointing out to customers how dangerous the direct lines were. However, IT departments have very little say over manufacturing networks. This isn't always a bad thing (see the many IT/help desk horror stories). Because the remote access is often required as part of the maintenance contract, offer to partner with manufacturing to install a small firewall with access filters that are controlled by IT, but set (requested) by manufacturing.

A small Cisco ASA, Juniper SRX or its like will do the job nicely, and can shield you from hack attempts along that access path.

Denmark is an awesome place I'm sure. It's also about half the population of the greater San Francisco Bay area, which isn't the largest metro area in the USA. You also have a relatively homogeneous culture (with a strong work ethic) and can't project military power very far beyond your borders (to protect your trade). You could drive anywhere in your country in less than a day.

Apples != Oranges.

Maintaining the infrastructure of an ISP is challenging over the long term, especially in an environment where your "expert" may sell her/his unit and leave. So you don't want to own any servers. However, it's a damn good idea to wire every unit to a common DMZ/patch bay in a secured space. I'd recommend running some sort of combo cable up to each unit (Cat 5, multimode fiber and RG6), something like this: http://www.smarthome.com/868241J/2-Cat-5e-2-RG6-Quad-Cable-Jacket-500-Feet-RG6-Coax-Cable/p.aspx Each subscriber can then decide how they want to access the Internet, and what they way to pay, and you don't get somebody knocking holes in your walls trying to run cable. You could even designate one of the Cat5 drops as a common net that you put cameras on, if you need to.

Drop in a full size 2 post rack, add in a few shelves (one for each ISP), and make power available. Done.

...they've always had a problem with this, though. I was there years ago (at the beginning of the Internet boom) and we were one of the most hacked targets on the planet. Everyone seems to think that all the secret UFO data was in NASAs network -- and the pace of attacks was astounding. You had to have an RSA token to login to anything. It got so bad that we ended up having to put an optical tap (even as contractors, we fought that one) on the FDDI ring what was MAE-WEST so the FBI and other TLAs could try to track some of these idiots down.

Given that funding went down and many of the top IT / networking guys went into the booming private sector, I'm not surprised it's still a problem. All of the mission critical stuff is pretty well walled off -- but the rest of it has major issues. I don't think we'll loose a spaceship to it, but getting your email can be very annoying.

A combination of VPN access and firewalling does the trick. I've tested it with AB (EthernetIP) gear and it works fine. There are quite a few vendors that will sell you the parts, but they aren't the traditional ones (Omron, AB, etc,...) so most of the controls folks seem to ignore their existence. When it comes to control, go to them. If it's data security, Cisco, Juniper,...

This thread has -- to me -- completely validated the reason for the existence of the Internet. I've gotten a non-linear metric ass-load of pleasure out of it.

My previous life had me using 'scopes every day. My experience: HP/Agillent got into the business because of a decision by the Navy, not because they built good scopes. I love everything else they make but...

Tektronix, on the other hand, builds scopes you can beat the crap out of. I'm talking "put it on the back of a golf cart and drag it around an accelerator" or "I'm in the middle of a desert and I need a scope" crap out of. Reliable as hell, and thats a critical thing for a school. My engineering department had us sleeping on lab benches to wait to get access to the few working Siemens logic analyzers, so reliability is key.

Pay the money, go with Tek. They'll work well, and continue to work.