Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror

Comment Actually, habitable is a reletive term (Score 1) 64

by Lord Northern (#29322669) Attached to: Kepler Mission Could Detect Exomoons
When talking about "habitability" in the context of Kepler Mission, it's more like "as much as Kepler can say about this object's Habitability". It's not necessarily that the planet or the moon are within the so called habitable zone. Since Kepler is able to analyze the atmosphere on some of the bigger objects, a planet within the habitable zone but with an invalid atmosphere or for example a gas giant would not be considered "habitable" by Kepler's standards. It also includes many other factors. Not just the location of the object within the habitable zone of its star.
Space

Submission + - Kepler believed to be able to discover exomoons! (redorbit.com)

Submitted by
Lord Northern
Lord Northern writes: "According to several news sources, Kepler mission is said to be able to detect habitable moons orbiting planets on other solar systems.
Kepler is a NASA space telescope designed to detect exoplanets. It'll be on its mission orbiting the sun for 3.5 years at the end of which we'll be able to tell which of our neighboring stars actually have planetary systems around them.
However, apparently we will be able to detect not only exoplanets, but also exomoons orbiting those exoplanets. The Kepler team came to that conclusion after running a computer simulation, which found that the telescope was sensitive enough to detect gravitational pull of an orbiting moon which means that the data expected by the end of the mission is going to be very rich as it is said that moons as small as 0.2 times the mass of earth could be detected."
Television

MPAA Pushes Once Again To Close the Analog Hole 275

Posted by kdawson from the encrypted-pipe-to-your-eardrum dept.
Tyler Too writes "The MPAA is once again trying to badger the FCC into approving Selectable Output Control, which would plug the 'analog hole' during broadcasts of some prerelease HD movies. MPAA bigshots met with seven staffers from the FCC Media Bureau last week, calling the petition a 'pro-consumer' (!) move designed to 'enable movie studios to offer millions of Americans in-home access to high-value, high definition video content.' At least the studios are now acknowledging that SOC would break the functionality of some HDTVs, an admission they were previously unwilling to make: 'What's interesting about the group's latest filing, however, is that it effectively concedes that the output changes it wants could, in fact, hobble some home video systems. "The vast majority of consumers would not have to purchase new devices to receive the new, high-value content contemplated by MPAA's" request, the group assures the FCC.'"

Slashdot Top Deals

Brain damage is all in your head. -- Karl Lehenbauer

Close