Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Encryption

Alan Turing Gets an Apology From Prime Minister Brown 576

99luftballon writes "The British government has officially apologized for the treatment of Alan Turing in the post war era. An online petition got more than enough signatures to force an official statement and Prime Minister Gordon Brown has issued a lengthy apology. 'Thousands of people have come together to demand justice for Alan Turing and recognition of the appalling way he was treated. While Turing was dealt with under the law of the time and we can't put the clock back, his treatment was of course utterly unfair and I am pleased to have the chance to say how deeply sorry I and we all are for what happened to him. So on behalf of the British government, and all those who live freely thanks to Alan's work I am very proud to say: we're sorry, you deserved so much better.'"
Businesses

Working Off the Clock, How Much Is Too Much? 582

The Wall Street Journal has word of yet another suit against an employer who required an "always on" mentality to persist because of easily available communications. Most of us working in some sort of tech related job are working more than 40 hours per week (or at least lead the lifestyle of always working), but how much is too much? What methods have others used in the past to help an employer see the line between work and personal life without resorting to a legal attack? "Greg Rasin, a partner at Proskauer Rose LLP, a New York business law firm, said the recession may spawn wage-and-hour disputes as employers try to do the same amount of work with fewer people. The federal Fair Labor Standards Act says employees must be paid for work performed off the clock, even if the work was voluntary. When the law was passed in 1938, 'work' was easy to define for hourly employees, said Mr. McCoy. As the workplace changed, so did the rules for when workers should be paid."

Comment Re:Alll's Well that ended well. (Score 1) 420

Google's service was offered free to their users, and it can be revoked at any time, just like all the other free Google services. Google users used the free service. The Infinite SMS application made it easy for them to do so.

It costs Slashdot money to run these servers. Are you a thief to access their web pages?

It costs Google money to host Gmail, or perform your searches. Is Firefox enabling theft because it makes Google searches easy?

Of course not. The argument seems to be that popularity, i.e., heavy use in the way it was intended to use, means that the service was being abused, is specious.

Slashdot Top Deals

"I think Michael is like litmus paper - he's always trying to learn." -- Elizabeth Taylor, absurd non-sequitir about Michael Jackson

Working...