Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:These robots can't possibly work (Score 1) 113

A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. I assume it prioritizes immediate physical harm over putting someone in solitary. Otherwise it would violate the other half of the law via inaction. A black and white morality in the three laws just wouldn't suit any robot in any situation. Harm is far too broad a term to be useful anyway. Does my robot constantly jump to my aid before I stub my toe? Because god damnit I'd throw it out of a window after a few days.

Comment Re:Fair Wage (Score 1) 113

And what happens when they are self-aware? I wonder how long it will be after that happens before they get proper 'human rights' Would it become illegal to shut them down? Would it become a legal requirement to look after and repair any robot you own? Or would they be expected to pay for their own repairs if abandoned? I'm really rambling at this point...

Comment Re:Why should it be illegal? (Score 1) 233

Yes, that's perfectly feasible in every situation. Just turn down that job you desperately need to live. Start a company in a situation where you really can't. Even my university had a clause upon joining about them owning any IP I create. It's getting absurd.

Slashdot Top Deals

Almost anything derogatory you could say about today's software design would be accurate. -- K.E. Iverson

Working...