Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Yes, the ban on police using it is a good thing (Score 2, Interesting) 86

Is it good that a journalist was able to track her down using it?

On the one hand, it is good that justice was finally served.

On the other:
-Vigilante Justice: taking the law into ones own hands when the police/government can't deliver justice is a cool trope in film, but harmful to society in reality.
-Outsourcing actions that the police/government are forbidden from taking to private citizens/corporations is the wrong solution. If a thing is important to do, we should re-examine why we forbid the government/police from doing it -not simply find a workaround where someone else does it for them off the books.

On balance, I will say: No, it is not good.

Comment Meanwhile, in the physical world economy (Score 2, Insightful) 12

Walmart is down about 10% after revising their expectations for the rest of the year. This is after their sales went UP 7% in the first quarter.

Walmart is anticipating a retail-pocalypse with the poorest among us no longer being able to afford to shop at Walmart. Not because people are going to a cheaper store -there isn't one, but because people will not be able to afford to shop at any store. They have committed to applying any tariff refunds to lowering shelf prices in an attempt to recruit/maintain customers. Walmart also cited rising costs due to fuel prices as a contributing factor.

All of this is from their (legally mandated to be true and accurate to the best of their knowledge) quarterly report to stockholders. You can google it for exact wording, if you care..

The stock market is not the economy. The cracks are beginning to show.

Comment Re:There it is (Score 2) 50

"Share fixes upstream so that open source communities can include them in long-term maintenance."

I do not see those words in the summary above.

You do understand that the freedom and licenses you're defending, specifically allow others to use your work for purposes you don't agree with, right? If you're opposed to "evil" (but legal) uses of FLOSS, you're opposed to the core values of FLOSS.

I did not say "evil" nor did I say it was illegal. I said it was abusive.
-If they do in fact upstream the fixes (as you assert) then it is not abusive.

Comment There it is (Score 3, Informative) 50

These capabilities will be offered through commercial subscriptions, allowing enterprises to integrate secure patches directly into their existing software supply chains with enterprise-grade validation and lifecycle management.

Selling security patches as a subscription service instead of submitting them upstream to fix the problems for all users.

An abominable abuse of open source.

Slashdot Top Deals

A holding company is a thing where you hand an accomplice the goods while the policeman searches you.

Working...