Almost nobody is trying to answer that question and I'm asking it from the beginning of this shitshow. I assume their idea is: we don't need juniors now and in the future AI gets good enough we won't need seniors. But this is a flawed logic because current approach to AI will never result in it being capable of replacing a senior humans. It's too variable and unpredictable, that's why it fails in production. My prediction is it's going to be extremely lucrative to be in IT in the coming years. There won't be enough juniors, seniors will be in decline while the whole world and their grandma will be making apps with better AI tools. There will be unprecedented demand in the wake of unseen decline of supply of engineering talent.

They can even hack the whole constellation of 50000 and point it at you and you wouldn't even get sunburn. It's a grift. Someone did the math already on this and in the best case scenario, ignoring basically everything that makes this worse, you get a glow on the ground comparable to full moon.

I'm willing to bet their end to end encryption is just lawyer speak for encryption between party 1&meta and meta&party 2.

Not interested in any research from this "scientist". Not having backups of your 2 years of research is just criminal and he should be liable for defrauding public funds. Posting it on ChatGPT is another offense making any of his findings basically meaningless. But then asking the platform to delete your data is just borderline stupid. I'd like to thank ChatGPT and apologize, AI is useful tool in science, specifically in getting rid of really bad science.

How is that a good thing, make it make sense. This is just6private profits and social losses. Essentially any taxpayer will be paying those companies to generate electricity.

So put them in jail for a decade and see if others are willing to join them. If we keep releasing criminals like this we will always be susceptible to sabotage. Call it what it is a hybrid war and treat those as war crimes. It's ridiculous that they are dragging anchors like this is something normal at sea and get away with it. They aren't dragging it from the port because they'd get stuck on something and had to cut it off, so they must drop it later near the cable. How is that for intent?

Right wingers will scream "socialism" while subsidizing entire industries and individual companies, while left likes to have a problem they can pretend to do something about while being in the pockets of the same industries and companies.

I mean who wouldn't want to use a famously volatile element in a closed system resembling a bomb that said element will be leaking from and be exposed to insane temperatures. Sounds really like a good idea to save 20% on energy while risking vaporizing your factory.

Maybe 3rd world countries shouldn't perform such surgeries?

That's very easy to explain. Falcon was a rocket designed by real rocket scientists and experts in their field. Back then Elon actually listened to them. But for Starship he began to believe that he was competent enough in rocket science to make those calls and ignored anyone telling him otherwise. That's why it's such a mess, had multiple redesigns and can't really get anywhere. Starship will not deliver what was promised, because the design is inherently shit. First it was supposed to be carbon fiber (nod to OceanGate) but that turned out to be shit, now it's stainless steel that after a round trip belongs on a scrapyard not on a rocket. Not to mention having to use tiles that was a huge problem and cost related to Space Shuttle. Now Starship has the same problems and loses tons of them when going back. How is that going to help rapid redeployment if you need to check 1mln tiles and replace every single one that's missing or defective (along with it's mounting, I don't even want to know what happens if the fastener breaks and do they plan to fix that). You can see the same thing with Tesla. Until Elon listened, they made good cars. Once his ego pumped and he decided he knows best, he pulled the plug on radar/lidar and that basically stalled self driving for a decade, same with 4680 battery, gigantic aluminum stamping pressess etc.

Once trips to LEO become a solved problem and cost effective (Starship etc.), we should focus on mining asteroids and bringing stuff back to earth/moon. This could jump start a new space race based on pure greed and advance our civilization further. Just as the previous gold rush did for the US. Once people/companies/government see it as profitable, there will be a significant amount of participants that will want to optimize the process further. Start with rare earths, gold, platinum, titanium etc. things that are very expensive on Earth but can potentially be cheap in space. If we build a 1 ton robot that can mine indefinitely on something like 16 Psyche and just send delivery rockets (ion propulsion?) between earth and it on rotation. As the "cargo hold" use something like Bigelow but instead of habitat make it just hold lots of ore. Those "bags" could be intercepted on earth by regular satellite missions and brought back with the first/second stage depending on mission profile. From what I understand we have all the technology that's necessary to do that right now. We just need someone to show everyone that it's possible.

From what I understand if you feed AI data to any type of LLM you get model collapse. Now, if you feed those LLMs data from the internet that's post-ChatGPT it's going to be increasingly riddled with AI. From reddit to Wikipedia, people are going to post what AI spills out. Nobody solves this problem, nobody talks about it and this is crucial to scaling LLMs with more data. But it turns out you need to use data until 2022, everything newer is "contaminated".

Jaguar is already gone, they just haven't realized it yet. Cars were shit and sales were falling off a cliff, then UK decided that Brexit was a great idea which made everything 10x worse. So in order to save themselves they decided to appeal to a group of people who don't buy cars, are permanently broke and instead of working fight imaginary societal problems...

Can you imagine the delay if anything happens to those astronauts? Might as well hand the trophy to China because NASA would be grounded for 5 years after a failure with loss of life. I really hope they return safely, because this is just pointless propaganda and risking your life for that isn't worth it.

All I see is wild accusations but never a shred of evidence that this is happening. It's just US propaganda against China. Same thing as with Huawei, not a single proof they were doing any snooping for Chinese government. But what they did is sell more phones than Apple and became a real threat to it's market share. Only country that had verified and confirmed backdoors inside it's hardware sold to other countries is the US.