Theres a lot of snark going on here but:
1. You just download tool that makes the bootable usb for you
2. you dont need to modify bios, just figure out the boot menu key (F12?)
3. Boot and install windows
4. The key is installed into the bios - you dont need to write it down and it should activate just fine

Its not the cost of the device - its how durable and manageable it is. It needs to be dead simple to manage since its usually 1 guy for a whole school district.

Its high time printer companies support some universal print (HP PCL6) and some unified scan thing instead of the turbo barf web printer socket crap. I think the newest flavor of Windows drivers tried to do some of that, but failed turbo hard.

Its already cross platform, .net, easy to use...what the heck.

My buddy and I have these for temp storage and we dont really take care of them, but have had them well over a year without any issues.

I buy a ton of SSDs for work, and personal use (homelabs) and have had the following die:
6 intel drives (8MB bug on 4 of these, most otherwise just crapped the bed)
1 WD 770 1TB (took a whole system out - must have shorted out the PCIe bus or something wild)
1 Crucial SATA SSD (1TB) - DOA
1 Lite-On (OEM HP Drive) die - this one slowed to a crawl first, and let us back up data and then died
2 Samsung (though I purchase a TON of these) - They technically are DOA but firmware updates and a total wipe and reformat got them working again

Samsung EVO drives kind of suck - super not performant but work. I do like the WD 850X series (so far) and Samsung 9xx series. I have no issues with PNY, Micron/Crucial (before this year), Samsung, higher end WD.

I agree as an admin - I hate using linux desktop or server because of the packaging alone. Every flavor of distro has to be absolutely different in their base setup and configuration and it makes using it casually a nightmare.

Windows has MSI and android APK why doesn't linux have a standard, easy to use, cross distro packaging standard people can at least /try/ to follow?

I believe they did indeed lay fiber. Its all dark, unused. The rest of the cash went into pockets of C Levels. Without requirements to have residents confirm they get good speeds and a copy of their bill at a reasonable price, then all bets are off.

>SpaceX rockets failed repeatedly before getting it right

They didn't, though. There is a HUGE difference between test flights and production flights.

Falcon 1 scheduled several test flights. This where test flights, designed as such, and carrying accordingly mass-simulators, broken satellites, or a bloody wheel of cheese. Their first few failed, which was expected, and not a concern, as this are test flights. Then they reached orbit succesfully, and so they went into production. Their next flight was a production flight, and worked flawlessly too.

Then Falcon 9 came, which worked flawlessly on their first flight, and flew flawlessly for 5 straight years. They had ONE in-flight failure with 1.1, then absolutely none since FT. So 8 years of flawless launches, almost 200 of them too.

Virgin Orbit offers expensive, inconvenient, unreliable launches.

For instance, Electron costs *half* of what a LauncherOne will cost you, and RocketLab is more reliable, has more launches under their belt, and offers a fantastic truly customer-oriented system.

The supposed advantages of air-launch aren't such. First of all, it's for the most part a lie. "It's just a plane, so we can launch anywhere". Well, except you do need pretty much all facilities except for a launch tower at your airport. And you need authorizations from everyone, from the FAA to the airport itself, local authorities, etc. Launching from another country? Even more bureaucracy. And it'll only be ok if it's a NATO country and the US gives the Ok for it (because ITAR). So all of those advantages evaporate fairly quickly.

If you want cheaper, and your orbit allows it, you can get on a SpaceX ridesharing mission. Anywhere from 300k to around 2 to 3 million for the max payload capacity that LauncherOne can handle. And you're launching on the most reliable rocket in history.

The problem with their last launch is a fundamental flaw, not necessarily on design, but on how they do things. Their processes are horrible. Sure, they aren't the same company as Virgin Galactic now, but they used to be, and they obviously inherited the same culture.

VO was already not very appealing, but now there are even more options, and more are coming. VO hasn't gone the way of Astra yet for the same reason BO isn't out of business: A big ego with big pockets behind it.

Ban stuff, steal from you, and generally stand in the way of progress. People seem to have forgotten now, but they shut down a whole lot more than just the internet in 2020, and the sheep seemed ok with it.

Generally, I agree with your sentiment, but also "letting them get away with it" is a bad precedent. We've already seen similar efforts from microsoft, and from other manufacturers. Apple isn't the first, nor will be the last, to try and lock down a platform.

Breaking whatever BS protection they throw at it and doing what you want with the platform is exercising your right to use your own stuff however the hell you want. It's like the US flying over what China claims as the South China Sea. Basically, use it or lose it.

That is correct. The first mission to carry humans for NASA wasn't a production mission, and so it was called Demo-2 (after Demo-1, which did everything but without people onboard). After that, Crew 1 through 6. So it's the 7th mission *for NASA*. In addition, they also flew Axiom 1 and Inspiration 4.

So, 1 manned demo mission, 6 missions for NASA in the main contract, "Crew" series, 1 for Axiom, 1 private, for a grand total of 9 missions with crew onboard so far.

Well, that's all leftists, isn't it? They loved Musk when their mind overlords told him he was ok because EV = Woke. Then they hated him when they were told to.

99% of all commie-shitposts on the internet say "Sent from my iPhone" below.

With that weird Intel Radeon NUC thing we had briefly, I was hoping intel licensed Radeon tech from AMD and was going to use that to benefit us all - with a competitor in the market. So far their offerings are underwhelming but at start I suppose.