I rarely post here, but this is so stupid I can't help myself.

I would love to see what percentage of participants were over the age of 50 twenty-five years ago. Not only that, but maybe those 37 percent were not only over 50 yrs old, but also reported boredom since having been a civil servant for many years.

And I could be way off, but my guess is you could survey 7524 people in that age group about ANYTHING and find that about that same percentage of them had died over that kind of time span.

How many died in accidents or by unrelated disease? What percentage reported boredom in the first place? And finally, how many died in murder-suicide pacts? After all, we are talking about civil servants here, they are ALL bored.

This article would mean more to me if it included more specific data supporting this claim.

How many test subjects where there?

What percentage of subjects playing which version displayed better ad recall? ETC

Without any specific data in the article it seems kind of meaningless. For all I know they may have had a very low number of test subjects, and those who played the bloody version just happened to have better attention to detail than those who played the clean version.

"Ortiz estimates that his bill would raise $50 million in revenue which would in turn be used to fund programs designed to counter childhood obesity."

What exactly is a program designed to counter childhood obesity? Would this involve slapping around the parents of fat kids?

I'm not sure a $50 million dollar program is going to make parents any more likely to limit their kid's tv/game time or stop feeding them fast food.

Perhaps a better way would be to have parents take their kids down to the Secretary of State and have them registered like cars, and pay a fee based on weight class.

I have to agree with the idea that this is a case of people confusing better with familiar. At the same time, I wonder how much effect different recording techniques have on this argument. For example, early CDs were basically an analog recording converted to digital, whereas I think most music today is taken straight to digital in the studio.

I think it would be interesting to present these same test subjects with two versions of the same song, one with an original source from vinyl, converted to digital and compressed to MP3, the other from a remastered recording on CD and compressed to the same bitrate MP3, removing the compression variable from the argument.

I have to think they would not sound the same, even though both were of the same compressed digital format in the end.

Then again, I mostly just listen to talk radio, so I'd be happy if they could just make AM stations sound better.