Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:What's the problem, anyway? (Score 0) 746

Yes, but the point still is you have have a choice.

You can install Linux, buy a mac, or use XP without updates. Or become a neophite and give up technology all together.

You still have the choice. Microsoft will not force you to use vista. Unless you consider losing access to updates being forced

But you have the choice to run XP without updates or without Antivirus. All they would be doing is not supplying updates anymore. But, you can still run xp.

OK, its not slower if you have a decent machine. Its Safer because it prompts you to do everything instead of just assuming you want to run it. And it is more reliable if you have new hardware.

The problem is people are running it on old hardware. So, its good if you are running new hardware. In fact as i said earlier, it has been more beneficial for me. So its not crap for me. Its good for me. Just not for you.

So quit using "crap" because its subjective and instead use "not good for me"

You have freedom of choice to do all that I mentioned or run your machine unprotected when they drop the support life cycle, so you are not being forced because you can choose how much protection you actually want to run with.

Programming

Submission + - A Flaming Linux Process Scheduler (kerneltrap.org)

An anonymous reader writes: The Linux 2.6.23 kernel is expected around the end of the month, and will be the first to include Ingo Molnar's much debated rewrite of the process scheduler called the Completely Fair Scheduler. In another Linux kernel mailing list thread one more developer is complaining about Molnar and his new code. However, according to KernelTrap a number of other Linux developers have stood up to defend Molnar and call into question the motives of the complaints. It will be interesting to see how the new processor really performs when the 2.6.23 kernel is released.
Intel

DDR3 Isn't Worth The Money - Yet 120

An anonymous reader writes "With Intel's motherboard chipsets supporting both DDR2 and DDR3 memory, the question now is whether DDR3 is worth all that extra cash. Trustedreviews has a lengthy article on the topic, and it looks like (for the moment) the answer is no: 'Not to be too gloomy about this, but the bottom line is that it can only be advised to steer clear of DDR3 at present, as in terms of performance, which is what it's all about, it's a waste of money. Even fast DDR2 is, as we have demonstrated clearly, only worthwhile if you are actually overclocking, as it enables you to raise the front-side bus, without your memory causing a bottleneck. DDR3 will of course come into its own as speeds increase still further, enabling even higher front-side bus speeds to be achieved. For now though, DDR2 does its job, just fine.'"

Slashdot Top Deals

"Take that, you hostile sons-of-bitches!" -- James Coburn, in the finale of _The_President's_Analyst_

Working...