Already done. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Do you otherwise find fingerless gloves to help? I also have a problem with losing dexterity in a cold office. I'd be willing to wear fingerless gloves at my desk if I thought they'd help, even if they aren't typical office attire.

THIS.

If the moose is a hundred feet away and the box pops up on your windshield three feet away, you have to refocus your eyes to see the box. If you do this, the object it's trying to warn you about will be out of focus. This isn't a problem in computer games because everything is in focus three feet from your face.

INB4 someone posts something about Betteridge's Law of Headlines, along with a link to the Wikipedia article informing all of us for the very, very, very first time that such a thing exists.

I believe it is "all versions." Pac-Man does have a perfect solution, and the maximum possible score has been achieved. Several people have done this, but Billy Mitchell is credited with being the first.

Oh, hi KentuckyFC! Or perhaps Soulskill.

You probably did not notice it when you were composing or editing the submission, but you wrote that the technology behind the T-1000 "might as well be science fiction." The T-1000 is indeed science fiction.

Since the phrase "might as well be" is used to describe a situation that is not actually true, but is used in the summary to describe a situation that actually is true, it reads as a quite silly.

In fact, the first line of your post, "yes, 'really,'" reads as similarly comical because you are also claiming that something that is widely known to be true not actually true, but "might as well be."

I hope that "clearly delineates" what I was trying to say. I apologize that it was "not obvious" to you, because, in fact, my original intent in posting was in the hopes that those who did not take the time to read the first sixteen words of the summary might notice the humorous mistake.

"The technology behind the T-1000 assassin in the Terminator movies might as well be science fiction" Might it? Might it really?

Nintendo stock was artificially high for several years due to the ridiculous success of the Nintendo Wii. What you're seeing is a return to values more in line with the company historically.

They're probably talking about actual, old-fashioned double-edge safety razors, not a Gillette Mach 3 Turbo or whatever. And yes, a very nice one can cost $78 and does not come with blades. The $78 razor would also be a heck of a lot nicer and shave a lot better than anything you could print, and would last for decades. I use one, and it's older than I am. I didn't pay anywhere near $78 for it. More like $10.

These scanners are NOT using UV illuminators, or interested in a "full spectrum" of light. They use near-infrared.

Yes, this is the most likely route they're taking. My fear is that this may actually promote the creation of new child porn. Google only knows to filter for hashes of images they already have, so this would add more value to the having the newest, latest stuff that is not in the database yet.

Those "find my iphone" things are actually quite often pretty inaccurate. They'll get you within a couple hundred yards, but that's not much help in a densely-populated area. You can find stories of folks who are constantly harassed because folks keep showing up on their doorstep because that's where their little dot tells them their phone is. That's a big part of the reason cops don't want to deal with it. For what it's worth, I'm not actually usually much of a defender of the police.

Those "find my iphone" things actually often have pretty poor accuracy. They'll get you within two hundred yards or something pretty reliably, but that's not all that helpful in a densely populated area. There are lots of stories of innocent people having folks show up at their door all hours of the day or night falsely accusing them of stealing their phones due to this. I'm not generally a big fan of police officers, but I think their (in)action in such cases is actually warranted here.

I'm just disappointed that this one didn't include a link to the Wikipedia article on Betteridge's Law.

I had T-Mobile for about seven years, up until a year ago. My default, free, "lousy" voicemail always played new messages before saved messages.