The only way I could see this making sense is if you wanted to be able to play those games on the go on a Vita, but then a) you would have to have good WiFi, which you aren't likely to have on the go (while there is a 3G model, the speed is almost surely inadequate and the cost would be high); b) the price is too high to justify it; and c) reports are it doesn't work well enough anyways.
Plus the library of available games is pretty poor (IMO). It's a wonder anyone is using the service such that it's still operating.
I'm just going to leave this here: https://vimeo.com/159496346
Automation dependency can kill, whether it's a car or an aircraft.
For example, they direct their representatives to tell customers that areas without a data cap actually have a 250GB cap, but it just isn't being enforced.
Well of course. It's called getting your foot in the door. They roll out a "cap" that isn't enforced, and simply start enforcing it little by little in different locations. Why are you complaining when it was there all along?
Exactly. There is a marked difference between broadcasting Chinese propaganda because that's your choice, and broadcasting Chinese propaganda because you're acting as an agent of the Chinese state. I don't think the government should be stopping this, but I also don't think it's unreasonable to interpret it that way.
Do you really think we should start measuring stories by how long they're produced or how much material is produced?
I mean, I wouldn't say I would agree with the assertion that the stories of those shows are inherently better, but I don't think the fact that Star Wars is getting another movie suddenly makes it better than other stories. By that standard, you could claim any work is better as long as it continues to be made, no matter how poor the quality is.
I have heard that small private charters are not a bad deal if you can fill the plane, but solo fliers of the target type are going to just fly first class.
Indeed. People seem to have an image in their heads of rich people always flying private, but the reality is that that private makes less and less sense the greater the distance being traveled (at least without stopping), where the aircraft required are considerably more costly to own and operate. There's a reason why Emirates and other carriers do offer such options, and why some American carriers offer first class on New York to LAX flights.
Suppose you are taken into a hospital room with no windows, anesthetized, destructively scanned, reconstructed, & then woken up later. How is that different (from your perspective, not the medical team's) from just being anesthetized & then waking up later? How do you expect your experience to differ in the 2 cases
In the latter case, I will experience waking up. In the first case, I will not experience waking up, because the consciousness will not have been truly continuous. My perspective will have ceased, and an identical copy of that consciousness will be created that will wake up. Even if the result was essentially exactly the same to the outside observer, it would not be to me.
You cannot experience not existing.
That one cannot experience not existing does not mean that one cannot not exist.
Heck, if you die you just "teleport" back again and you just miss a bit of memory.
But then, speaking not so much in Star Trek terms but in real terms, the original is still dead. You don't just "lose memory," the you that was is gone, soul or not. The consciousness is not continuous.
SteamOS is based on Linux and their new hardware will support at least Ubuntu from the start. Even non-Valve games franchises such as Borderlands are starting to support Linux.
Regardless of whether or not we'll ever see the Linux desktop take off, there can be little doubt that native gaming on Linux has made more progress in the last couple of years than in the entire history of the OS. Even if Linux remains niche on the desktop, that doesn't mean that it can't be a successful platform for gaming.
That was my first thought as well, though I suspect Twitter might come after them if they do.
But really, Twitter should have come up with some better reasoning, even if it would be "we have to apply the same rules for everybody." This just makes it sound like they support revisionism in politics.
You know you've landed gear-up when it takes full power to taxi.