I wouldn't discount the possibility that some part of this decline is due to Chinese consumer anger over the arrest of Meng Wanzhou (Huawei CFO) and the trade war being waged by the Trump administration.

Will Proof of Work for Food

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Try to realize the truth. There is no iPhone. Then you'll see that it is not the phone that bends, it is only yourself.

Without regard to the merits of either side of the argument -- would the scientists have much choice in deciding whether or not to sign this letter? I would imagine not signing the letter could lead to you being ostracized, labeled as a racist, possibly losing grants and so on. The path of least resistance for any individual geneticist would be to sign the letter.

Again, I'm not arguing that they're wrong. Just that there could be a lot of pressure for them to be 'right'.

To throw something into the sun, you have to essentially deorbit it from Earth's orbit. Given that the Earth's orbital velocity is about 30 km/sec, that's an awful lot of delta-v to muster.

It makes much more sense to park such waste in a different Sun orbit, or perhaps even an escape trajectory from the solar system. Both of these options would be possible with a MUCH smaller rocket.

It would take a ship travelling at that speed roughly two days to travel from Earth to the Sun (1 AU). In those terms it doesn't seem all that fast. Pedestrian, really.

How do you KNOW a situation like this isn't occurring: http://www.tdcaa.com/node/2871

Oh right, it is much more fun to form a strong opinion and talk about mach shit like rifles than carefully thinking through a situation and gathering more information.

Also from the CIA article:

"Fulton first used instrumented dummies as he prepared for a live pickup. He next used a pig, as pigs have nervous systems close to humans. Lifted off the ground, the pig began to spin as it flew through the air at 125 mph. It arrived on board undamaged but in a disoriented state. Once it recovered, it attacked the crew."

Too funny, I can only imagine what a berserker pig in an aircraft is like.

I got modded down as Flamebait, so I feel a bit vindicated now :)

Post from Saturday July 25 2009:
"One not-so-obvious candidate: JavaScript and HTML.

Pretty much every browser in existence supports JavaScript, so with nothing more than a simple text editor and your browser of choice you can be off and running. As far as beginning programming is concerned, JavaScript easily encompasses any programmatic constructs you'd need.

The best part is that the students can easily display the results of their test programs in HTML, either dynamically generated or just by manipulating some divs, textboxes, tables etc that they've written on their page. Additionally, an instructor could write a 'playground' bit of HTML and JavaScript, so all output variables are bound up and easy to access. At that point the student is free to focus on what really matters, his/her first logic routines. When the student has created his first masterpiece, sharing the accomplishment with parents/peers is as simple as sharing a link to their HTML file.

I think this has the potential to engage students much faster than observing console output or fighting with a front end like windows forms in VB or Swing in Java."

FWIW, I think engineers become terrorists for two simple reasons

1. Engineers are typically intelligent people who are perceptive enough to see and understand the inequities present in the world, and assign blame to individuals/groups/nations.
2. When confronted with a problem, engineers want to solve it. Unfortunately, terrorism may be the most effective way for an individual or small group to both gain retribution against the powers who oppress and gain the attention of the masses -- who are often completely ignorant of the situation causing the terrorists to act.

I happened to be browsing Amazon while I had Fiddler2 running the other day, and noticed that they report every page scrolling event back to the server with. I'm guessing they use this to model exactly how a user interacts with their pages. At the time I had thought that was a lot of data for Amazon to be collecting, but clearly Google is one-upping them by collecting every mouse movement :)

One not-so-obvious candidate: JavaScript and HTML.

Pretty much every browser in existence supports JavaScript, so with nothing more than a simple text editor and your browser of choice you can be off and running. As far as beginning programming is concerned, JavaScript easily encompasses any programmatic constructs you'd need.

The best part is that the students can easily display the results of their test programs in HTML, either dynamically generated or just by manipulating some divs, textboxes, tables etc that they've written on their page. Additionally, an instructor could write a 'playground' bit of HTML and JavaScript, so all output variables are bound up and easy to access. At that point the student is free to focus on what really matters, his/her first logic routines. When the student has created his first masterpiece, sharing the accomplishment with parents/peers is as simple as sharing a link to their HTML file.

I think this has the potential to engage students much faster than observing console output or fighting with a front end like windows forms in VB or Swing in Java.

This is absolutely true -- I work for a pretty large web development shop, and over 30% of our client browsers are IE6. The corporate world just can't lay out the money to upgrade their customized browsers, rework intranet sites, etc.

Our management has decided to support IE6 for another year at least -- there is just no way we could justify losing 30% of our client base, no matter how many hoops we must jump through to get our client side working in IE 6/7/8, FF2/3/3.5 etc. The legacy of IE6 will remain with us for quite some time I'm afraid.

http://www.amazon.com/Pocket-Ref-Thomas-J-Glover/dp/1885071000

'Pocket Ref' is a conveniently sized book containing an absolutely outrageous amount of data. In 3-3/4" x 5-1/2" x 3/4" dimensions and around 500 pages, Thomas Glover covers topics from ASCII tables, to load bearing capacities of 2'x4's, to a comprehensive math and physics formula 'cheat sheet'.

I don't know if it is possible to exaggerate how useful this book is. Along with a decent calculator and a knack for solving practical problems, you will be unstoppable with the Pocket Ref at your side. McGyver certainly had a copy hidden in his shirt pocket.