Comment Re: Good, now combine it with Gen-1.5 robots... (Score 1) 189
Shit. I thought the daleks were the final form!
Daleks are not robots, there is an organic being inside.
Shit. I thought the daleks were the final form!
Daleks are not robots, there is an organic being inside.
The parliament can retire every commissioner or the whole commission, if they vote so.
The parliament can only retire the commission as a whole, it cannot retire individual commissioners. I explained that in a previous post.
Sorry, why argue about something that is not important to you - and you have no clue about?
I do not know why you think that: I work with the EU administration on a daily basis and I have taken several courses on the EU institutions.
Only if the directive is leading to a law, established by the European Parliament.
No, a directive IS a law, the member states have an obligation to implement it as a national law. However until the member states have implemented it as a national law, the national courts will not enforce it.
And, does not matter what, the governments involved behind the directive(s) are voted into power by their respectively citizens.
Agreed, I am not implying that the EU is not democratic.
but they have no right to take the initiative on European legislation: That is also nitpicking, as you pointed out here: "The European Parliament has the right to request the Commission to initiate a legislative procedure and put forward a proposal"
I also disagree that this is nitpicking: members of national parliaments have the right to propose legislation, to which the national government has to adhere if that proposal is adopted by the parliament. The European Parliament cannot do that: they can only ask the Commission to please propose something. The Commission has no obligation to be forthcoming. This is really a severe limit on the power of the European Parliament.
The German parliament also has no power over the ministers
It goes further than that: in general national parliaments can censure the government (I am not well versed in the German situation, but this is the case in Belgium and many other countries), just as the European Parliament can censure the European Commission. The European Parliament however has no means at all to censure the European Council or the Council of the European Union, since those consist of ministers of the member states.
And what is your point?
My point is that the European Union is not a republic, which was stated by the Great-great-great-grandparent post, since the member states have a lot of power in the EU and hardly anything on EU level happens without consent from the national governments.
I know that about 80% of national legislation in the EU nowadays comes "from Europe" in the form of directives, but those were most times negotiated between the governments of the member states beforehand.
Waste is waste. All computers eventually end up as it
The Lenovo laptop I type this on is 15 years old, it runs Linux and I use it every day.
I have 3 perfectly working computers (two Sharp MZ-80K's and a HP-85, none of those run anything by Microsoft) in the room here that are over 46 years -almost half a century- old. My HP-1660C logic analyzer is about 30 years old. My Wyse WY-60 terminal is 40 years old (connected to a Udoo Bolt V8 computer from 2019 which I also use every day, and which is also running Linux -- Windows 11 is not supported on it even if that computer is only 7 years old).
None of those machines is obsolete, the HP-85 has an SD-card interface. Whenever I need to make a quick calculation I turn on the HP-85, I can even print out the results with the built-in printer. The MZ-80K's are running software that I wrote and assembled/compiled on my Linux machines. There is also an SD card interface for the MZ-80K.
Why is it Microsoft's fault that *checks's notes* a TEN YEAR OLD COMPUTER can't run Windows 11?
Because Microsoft introduced artificial limitations that prevent perfectly working computers to run Windows 11.
Information is the inverse of entropy.