Comment Re: 86 (Score 1) 91
That interpretation didn't even cross my mind and I didn't see the AC post he responded to, so thanks for the clarification.
That interpretation didn't even cross my mind and I didn't see the AC post he responded to, so thanks for the clarification.
I don't know if your question is in gest or not, but the x86 refers to the CPU-architecture that was first introduced with the Intel 8086 processor that was released in 1978.
Very simplified, they are usually connected in series to get a meaningful voltage to the controller to avoid high amperage situations and it allows the inverter and the BMS to work efficiently if the nominal voltage from the panels matches those of the batteries.
There is much more to it than that, sizing a panel and battery installation is very dependent on how it's supposed to be used.
Seems you don't know how to debate your point, because just claiming you are right is lazy, stupid and a cop-out. Do you have any facts at all? Quotes taken out of context and your personal opinion doesn't count as facts - it just shows that this is more about your feelings than factual reality.
Preferable under the age of 18 apparently.
The original argument was that "being pro vaccines is not left wing" and you then provided a counter argument that conflated Biden being skeptical of what the prior Trump administration was claiming about a yet to be released vaccine with him being skeptical of vaccines. These are two vastly different things and conflating the two in an effort to make the point you just did shows that your argument is based on politics and not actual facts.
Or perhaps you are one of those who believe every claim being made, even when it comes from someone you would never trust? If you don't, why are you basing your argument on that premise, that Biden should have accepted everything Trump claimed about a vaccine?
Also, the quotes provided are taken out of context, let's add some context to the first one from Aug 5, 2020:
The fact is that the way he talks about the vaccine is not particularly rational. He's talking it being ready. He's going to talk about moving it quicker than the scientists think it should be moved. It matters to let the people know that it is all transparent, exactly what the facts are. Let the medical community writ large speak to it so that there's transparency. Look, I think people are going to, as the poll show and we talked about it today with the two docs and my staff, that in fact people don't believe that he's telling the truth. Therefore, they're not at all certain they're going to take the vaccine. One more thing, if and when the vaccine comes, and it's not likely to go through all the tests that needs and the trials that are needed to be done, and the question is, is he going to seek emergency move? Well, I think it's really important right now. I proposed a $25 billion plan for the distribution to guarantee that every single American has access to the vaccine because what's going to happen, you know as well as I do, if the vaccine came out tomorrow, how in the heck would we get it to people? There is no game plan they have. How would everybody in America have access to it? It is a gigantic, gigantic problem to distribute, even if we have it. That's we should be planning for now. Now. Not when we get it.
The other quote from July 28, 2020 which also was taken out of context, here's the context:
But I want to say it again, I'm going to keep saying it. The president, as we speak, should be starting and should have started three months ago to put someone in charge of how specifically, like waging a war. How are you going to distribute the vaccine when it arrives, when it arrives, when it's there? And the question of whether it's real, when it's there, that requires enormous transparency. You got to make all of it available to other experts across the nation, so they can look and see. So there's consensus, this is a safe vaccine. Because already you have, what percent is American people saying if the vaccine were there tomorrow, they wouldn't take it? And it's not the usual anti-vaccine crowd it's beyond that because people are losing faith in what the president says. Think about it.
See how much more sense it makes when we have the contexts from which the quotes was unceremoniously yanked out of. It's almost like it was intentional to make people think Biden meant one thing when it's the opposite.
You can find the whole transcripts here: https://www.rev.com/transcript... and https://www.rev.com/transcript...
TL;DR: Being skeptical about what one man says about a topic isn't the same as being skeptical about the topic.
Had a long discussion with a communist many years ago, and his argument was that communism doesn't work at scale because you need hierarchies for it to work which leads to stratification of power, ie you still will get serfs that has no power ruled by those few holding all the power. Look at any supposedly communist state (current and historically) and you'll find that this is true.
He argued that communism only works in small groups were everyone can actually physically be present at meetings that decides what the common goal was for they group. Not everyone will agree to decisions made, but everyone will know the rationale behind them and how was delegated power to see them through. The moment your group is large enough that you need to create representatives for different internal groups it all starts to fall apart into power stratification.
There is no heat pump that produces hot water on demand, they all have an internal tank holding hot water for use when needed and are usually an 1to1 replacement for combi boilers but it is dependent on how you heat your property, ie with water radiators or ducting.
It's a good advice regardless, because the alternative is waiting for a firestorm to burn it down, or a flood inundating it, or it gets torn apart by a tornado while living with the knowledge that you could lose everything in the near future, including family members. Sometimes you just have to cut your losses to avoid getting deeper into trouble, and for some that's damn hard to accept or even manage practically and financially.
Some think what I'm saying is heartless, but I'm just pointing out the reality of the situation and reality doesn't care one bit about any arguments why it's hard for some people to move. And to those who think I'm heartless, why aren't they helping people financially that have ended up with a property that is essentially worthless due to climate changes? The answer is of course: Talk is cheap...
Pretty much this. I have raised this point on several occasions and a lot of people just scoffed at it. It's very simple, if you can't get insurance or if the premium is exorbitant in a particular area - move ASAP. The alternative, as you mentioned, is a high chance of loosing everything and going bankrupt.
It's not about the money, it's trying to get the law to stick. If NPD pays up they admit they have to follow the law, since they didn't pay up California is now suing them which makes it much harder for NPD to dodge the law since they now have to argue in court why that is. They can of course ignore the case which most likely will lead to a default-judgement against them, and that can lead to other legal problems which can be escalated until NPD has to deal with them.
If you want access to all the settings in Windows 10 or 11, create a folder and rename it to: GodMode.{ED7BA470-8E54-465E-825C-99712043E01C}
You know have access to ALL settings one click away.
Heatpumps are a great way to heat/cool houses in temperate climates but when you start getting extremes then you have to be very careful about the type of unit you install.
By cheap crap, get crap performance. Equipment that can work on wider temperature-ranges are always a bit more expensive, but not much.
In countries where sub-zero temps are commonplace it's often a better option to use a ground-based heat source. This means laying pipes underground where the temperature remains higher than above-ground. This can provide much better performance.
If you have the money, because it's about 8-10x more expensive up front. There are also other considerations, do you have enough land to put the pipes in or do you need to drill a deep hole to extract heat from?
Unfortunately, it's often much cheaper just to use an above-ground heat-pump with an air-based radiator/heat-exchanger setup and so bad outcomes can occur.
An air2air heatpump can cover 95% of your cooling and heating needs, the last 5% is the expensive part to cover.
You also have to wonder don't you... if a heatpump can effectively produce 3KW of heat with 1KW of electrical energy -- why don't we have over-unity perpetual motion (I know the answer but do you)?
Why would one wonder? It's a heatpump, it moves heat around - it doesn't actually produce it.
Think about it a bit
Two of them were pandemics, but with varying scale:
- SARS in 2003, from civet cats
- MERS in 2012, from camels
- SARS-COV-2 in 2019, from raccoon dogs (or other species)
It's worth to note that you are only listing the strains that posed a threat the last 20 years. Considering the very large amount of different strains floating around in animals, a crossover event producing a variant like SARS-COV-2 was only a matter of time and it will happen again.
Well, that bet actually turned out wrong since Trump filed a FEC complaint against WaPo, ie Bezo's nixxing of the endorsement didn't help in the least to get him into Trump's good graces.
FEC Complaint: https://s3.documentcloud.org/d...
Doubt isn't the opposite of faith; it is an element of faith. - Paul Tillich, German theologian and historian