The answers actually can be a range of things ... you can get paid to take the ball (cost is negative), or you can have money left over. The question is actually ambiguous, and would only give the answer claimed if one made some primitive assumptions about the nature of money or whatnot. Besides, are they calculating equivalent cost of the wage you would be paid for the time it took you to buy it, are all amounts in US dollars or are they using cents from a different currency -- is inflation included (granted it would probably be minute). What definition of 'cost' are they using? What if the value of the bat deprecates according to some tax code can you include the deprecation on your taxes, and count the deprecation discount toward the original 'cost'? Does 'cost' include travel allowance for vehicle repair if you drove to the place where you would buy it, the 'cost' of the food you ate and the medical care you received to be functional enough to walk from your car (midwife, etc...). The simple riddle question brings up a whole lot more questions, nevermind the implication if they PAY you $5 to take the ball. And what if you have a 10% coupon for one item but not both and everything in the store is marked down 25% from the sticker price!?